Economic evaluations in the healthcare are used to assess economic efficiency of pharmaceuticals and medical interventions such as diagnoses and medical procedures. This study introduces the main concepts of economic evaluation across its key steps: planning, outcome and cost calculation, modeling, cost-effectiveness results, uncertainty analysis, and decision-making. When planning an economic evaluation, we determine the study population, intervention, comparators, perspectives, time horizon, discount rates, and type of economic evaluation. In healthcare economic evaluations, outcomes include changes in mortality, the survival rate, life years, and quality-adjusted life years, while costs include medical, non-medical, and productivity costs. Model-based economic evaluations, including decision tree and Markov models, are mainly used to calculate the total costs and total effects. In cost-effectiveness or costutility analyses, cost-effectiveness is evaluated using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, which is the additional cost per one additional unit of effectiveness gained by an intervention compared with a comparator. All outcomes have uncertainties owing to limited evidence, diverse methodologies, and unexplained variation. Thus, researchers should review these uncertainties and confirm their robustness. We hope to contribute to the establishment and dissemination of economic evaluation methodologies that reflect Korean clinical and research environment and ultimately improve the rationality of healthcare policies.
Summary
Korean summary
보건의료분야에서 경제성 평가는 의약품과 진단검사 및 치료법 등 의료기술에 대한 평가에서 널리 활용되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 경제성 평가절차를 경제성 평가 설계, 결과 산출, 비용산출, 모형 구축 및 분석, 비용-효과성 결과 제시 및 불확실성 평가와 의사 결정 단계로 나누어 주요 개념과 쟁점들을 소개하였다.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a virtual Hospital in the Home service for COVID-19 infection: A cohort study and modelled decision analysis Linh K Vo, Michelle J Allen, Steven M McPhail, Shannon Wallis, Kelly McGowan, Kate Atkinson, Hannah E Carter Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare.2026; 32(4): 348. CrossRef
Model-Based Economic Analyses of Haemophilia from a Societal Perspective: A Scoping Review Amr A. El-Sayed, Nancy S. Bolous PharmacoEconomics - Open.2026; 10(1): 71. CrossRef
Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of artificial intelligence-enhanced osteoporosis screening in men and women using routine chest radiographs in South Korea Mickael Hiligsmann, Sung Hye Kong, Majed Alokail, Mi-Young Kim, Jean-Yves Reginster JBMR Plus.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Cost Considerations in Penile Implantation Revision Surgery from a Global Perspective Ahmad Majzoub Current Urology Reports.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Understanding perceptions and the willingness of decision-makers to adopt a public-private partnership strategy in the Palestinian health sector: an exploratory study Mohammad Baniode, Motasem Hamdan BMC Health Services Research.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Understanding Data and Opportunities Focused on Value Andrew M. Wilson, Martha Sylvia, Anelyssa D'Abreu, Connor Hansen, Maha Salah-Ud-Din, Aiesha Ahmed Neurology Clinical Practice.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Cost-effectiveness of intracranial pressure monitoring in severe traumatic brain injury in Southern Thailand Jidapa Jitchanvichai, Thara Tunthanathip Acute and Critical Care.2025; 40(1): 69. CrossRef
Importance of Health Economics and Outcomes Research in the Product Lifecycle Amit Dang Pharmaceutical Medicine.2025; 39(3): 157. CrossRef
Statistics and data in health economics Anthony Lockett Medicine.2025; 53(6): 396. CrossRef
Economic impact of RSV infections in young children attending primary care: a prospective cohort study in five European countries, 2021 to 2023 Valérie DV Sankatsing, Sarah F Hak, Joanne G Wildenbeest, Roderick P Venekamp, Mauro Pistello, Caterina Rizzo, Santiago Alfayate-Miguélez, Daan Van Brusselen, Marta Carballal-Mariño, Uy Hoang, Rolf Kramer, Simon de Lusignan, Oliver Martyn, Marc Raes, Adam
Eurosurveillance.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
A cost-utility analysis of pharmacopuncture versus physiotherapy for chronic low back pain: A multicenter, pragmatic randomized controlled trial Ye-Seul Lee, Soo Jin Kim, Kyung Sun Park, Yoon Jae Lee, Changsop Yang, Chang-Hyun Han, In-Hyuk Ha Integrative Medicine Research.2025; 14(4): 101210. CrossRef
Evaluation of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of safinamide versus rasagiline: a systematic review Antonio J García Ruiz, Ester Morales García, María José Gómez Heredia, Francisco Pérez Errazquin, Nuria García-Agua Soler Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Clinical and Socioeconomic Burden of RSV Infections Among Older Adults in Primary Care: An International Prospective Cohort Study Sarah F. Hak, Joanne G. Wildenbeest, Sara Bracaloni, Michela Scarpaci, Tommaso Cosci, Enrica Esposito, Maria Chironna, Donatella Panatto, Giancarlo Icardi, Melissa Torrisi, Leonardo Bonaldo, Eugenio Mammolenti, Emma te Bogt, Jacqueline Vlaskamp‐Smit, Loui Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
The economic burden of brucellosis in Western Iran Meysam Behzadifar, Banafsheh Darvishi Teli, Samad Azari, Ahad Bakhtiari, Mariano Martini, Masoud Behzadifar Tropical Medicine and Health.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
β-Lactam allergy delabeling is safe and saves costs in Primary Care Joaquín Quiralte, María del Robledo Ávila, Isabel Domínguez, Estela Menéndez, José Miguel Cisneros, Ana Belén Guisado Atención Primaria.2024; 56(11): 102925. CrossRef
National Recommendations for Pharmacoeconomic Evaluations Reporting for Reimbursement and Procurement of New Pharmaceutical Applications in Egypt Mary Gamal, Amal Samir Sedrak, Gihan Hamdy Elsisi, Ahmed Elagamy, Ahmed Seyam, Mariam Eldebeiky, Randa Eldessoki Global Journal on Quality and Safety in Healthcare.2024; 7(4): 216. CrossRef
Implementation Science in School Mental Health: A 10-Year Progress Update and Development of a New Research Agenda Aaron R. Lyon, Elizabeth H. Connors, Gwendolyn M. Lawson, Erum Nadeem, Julie Sarno Owens School Mental Health.2024; 16(4): 1013. CrossRef
Outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales at a long-term care facility in Seoul, Korea: surveillance and intervention mitigation strategies Yoojin Park, Euncheol Son, Young June Choe, Cho Ryok Kang, Sangmi Roh, Young Ok Hwang, Sung-il Cho, Jihwan Bang Epidemiology and Health.2023; 45: e2023057. CrossRef
Objectives There is no systematic review on economic evaluations of telemedicine in Japan, despite over 1000 trials implemented. Our systematic review aims to examine whether Japan’s telemedicine is cost-saving or cost-effective, examine the methodological rigorousness of the economic evaluations, and discuss future studies needed to improve telemedicine’s financial sustainability.
Methods We searched five databases, including two Japanese databases, to find peer-reviewed articles published between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2014 in English and Japanese that performed economic evaluations of Japan’s telemedicine programs. The methodological rigorousness of the economic analyses was assessed with a well-established checklist. We calculated the benefit-to-cost ratio (BCR) when a reviewed study reported related data but did not report the BCR. All cost values were adjusted to 2014 US dollars.
Results Among the 17 articles identified, six studies reported on settings connecting physicians for specialist consultations, and eleven studies on settings connecting healthcare providers and patients at home. There are three cost-benefit analyses and three cost-minimization analyses. The remaining studies measured the benefit of telemedicine only, using medical expenditure saved or users’ willingness-to-pay. There was substantial diversity in the methodological rigorousness. Studies on teledermatology and teleradiology indicated a favorable level of economic efficiency. Studies on telehomecare gave mixed results. One cost-benefit analysis on telehomecare indicated a low economic efficiency, partly due to public subsidy rules, e.g., a too short budget period.
Conclusions Overall, telemedicine programs in Japan were indicated to have a favorable level of economic efficiency. However, the scarcity of the economic literature indicates the need for further rigorous economic evaluation studies.
Summary
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
The impact of telehealth videoconferencing on the healthcare work system: designing for sustained practice Nicola Green, David Tappin, Tim Bentley Applied Ergonomics.2026; 130: 104641. CrossRef
High capital intensity and financial risk in rare fungi production: an environmental life cycle costing of Dictyophora rubrovolvata Ke Li, Amir Hamzah Sharaai, Nik Nor Rahimah Nik Ab Rahim Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Utilization of telemedicine in conjunction with wearable devices for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial Kazuhiro Hayashi, Kenji Miki, Yukiko Shiro, Tomoko Tetsunaga, Toshifumi Takasusuki, Masako Hosoi, Masao Yukioka Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Sustainable Radiology: Health Equity and Quality Improvement Lima Awad El-Karim, Ania Kielar, Satheesh Krishna, Zeyad F. Elias, Hayley Panet, Maura Brown Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal.2025; 76(4): 588. CrossRef
Digital technologies and artificial intelligence for cognitive impairment correction in coronary heart disease depending on the presence of anemia: a review Tatyana Yu. Kalyuta, Angelina M. Poroshina, Alexander S. Fedonnikov Russian Medicine.2025; 31(6): 546. CrossRef
Efficacy and safety of a telemedicine system in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (TELEGLAM): a single-center, two-arm, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study (Preprint) Kazuki Aoyama, Yuya Nakajima, Shu Meguro, Yasunori Sato, Rei Goto, Mariko Hida, Takeshi Arimitsu, Yoshifumi Kasuga, Mamoru Tanaka, Hiroshi Itoh, Kaori Hayashi JMIR mHealth and uHealth.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Key Factors Influencing the Operationalization and Effectiveness of Telemedicine Services in Henan Province, China: Cross-Sectional Analysis Xianying He, Fangfang Cui, Minzhao Lyu, Dongxu Sun, Xu Zhang, Jinming Shi, Yinglan Zhang, Shuai Jiang, Jie Zhao Journal of Medical Internet Research.2024; 26: e45020. CrossRef
Analysis of the Forces Driving Public Hospitals’ Operating Costs Using LMDI Decomposition: The Case of Japan Kiyotoshi Kou, Yi Dou, Ichiro Arai Sustainability.2024; 16(2): 853. CrossRef
Remote consultations in community mental health: A qualitative study of clinical teams Robyn McCarron, Anna Moore, Ilana Foreman, Emily Brewis, Olivia Clarke, Abby Howes, Katherine Parkin, Diana Luk, Maisie Satchwell Hirst, Emilie Sach, Aimee Shipp, Lorna Stahly, Anupam Bhardwaj Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing.2024; 31(5): 857. CrossRef
Relationship Between Clinics Offering Telemedicine and Population Density in Japan: An Ecological Study Takashi Kuwayama, Kazuhiko Kotani Telemedicine Reports.2024; 5(1): 99. CrossRef
A Study of Factors Influencing the Acceptance of non-Face-to-Face Treatment Based on Social Cognitive Theory Myung Soon Kwon, Ji Hye Jang, Hyun Sik Kim, Yeon Jeong Heo Quality Improvement in Health Care.2024; 30(1): 55. CrossRef
Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Japanese Telemedicine Patient Satisfaction Andrew N Mason, Toshio Naito, Shinichi Fukushima, Keiko Asano, Ken Yamaji, Ryohei Kuwatsuru Health Services Insights.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Case study of a healthcare virtual community model Kun-Huang Huarng, Cheng-Fang Lee, Tiffany Hui-Kuang Yu Technological Forecasting and Social Change.2023; 188: 122281. CrossRef
COVID-19 pandemic and hypertension: an updated report from the Japanese Society of Hypertension project team on COVID-19 Shigeru Shibata, Kazuo Kobayashi, Masami Tanaka, Kei Asayama, Eiichiro Yamamoto, Hironori Nakagami, Satoshi Hoshide, Takuya Kishi, Chisa Matsumoto, Masaki Mogi, Satoshi Morimoto, Koichi Yamamoto, Masashi Mukoyama, Kazuomi Kario, Koichi Node, Hiromi Rakugi Hypertension Research.2023; 46(3): 589. CrossRef
The Twenty Factors that Made Teledermatology Consultation a Matured Application: A Systematic Review Garehatty Rudrappa Kanthraj Clinical Dermatology Review.2023; 7(1): 10. CrossRef
Applications, opportunities, and challenges in using Telehealth for burn injury management: A systematic review Mohammad Hosein Hayavi-Haghighi, Jahanpour Alipour Burns.2023; 49(6): 1237. CrossRef
Economic evaluation of remote patient monitoring and organizational analysis according to patient involvement: a scoping review Myriam Le Goff-Pronost, Isabelle Bongiovanni-Delarozière International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Acceptability and feasibility of assisted telepsychiatry in routine healthcare settings in India: a qualitative study Abhijit Nadkarni, Ankur Garg, Ravindra Agrawal, Seema Sambari, Kedar Mirchandani, Richard Velleman, Devika Gupta, Urvita Bhatia, Godwin Fernandes, Ethel D’souza, Akshada Amonkar, Anil Rane Oxford Open Digital Health.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Beyond the Nuts and Bolts: Tele-Critical Care Patients, Workflows, and Activity Patterns Christina Canfield, Silvia Perez-Protto, Matthew Siuba, Steven Hata, Chiedozie Udeh Telemedicine and e-Health.2022; 28(1): 73. CrossRef
Effectiveness of Pediatric Teleconsultation to Prevent Skin Conditions in Infants and Reduce Parenting Stress in Mothers: Randomized Controlled Trial Tomohisa Ando, Rintaro Mori, Kenji Takehara, Mari Asukata, Shuichi Ito, Akira Oka JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting.2022; 5(1): e27615. CrossRef
The Willingness to Pay for Telemedicine Among Patients With Chronic Diseases: Systematic Review Valerie Chua, Jin Hean Koh, Choon Huat Gerald Koh, Shilpa Tyagi Journal of Medical Internet Research.2022; 24(4): e33372. CrossRef
Telemedicine and Community Health Projects in Asia Anil Kumar Jha, Erika Sawka, Bhagirath Tiwari, Huiting Dong, Choon Chiat Oh, Seyedali Ghaemi, Xuejiao Zhang, Adarsh Kumar Jha Dermatologic Clinics.2021; 39(1): 23. CrossRef
A new telestroke network system in northern area of Okayama prefecture Ryo Sasaki, Toru Yamashita, Yoshio Omote, Mami Takemoto, Nozomi Hishikawa, Taijun Yunoki, Kazuki Kobayashi, Takashi Sawata, Yuki Sato, Junichi Kubota, Masayuki Mizobuchi, Takashi Hayashi, Koji Abe Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience.2021; 9(2): 166. CrossRef
Opportunities and challenges for contactless healthcare services in the post-COVID-19 Era Sang M. Lee, DonHee Lee Technological Forecasting and Social Change.2021; 167: 120712. CrossRef
Creation of a Learning Environment Contributing to the Development
of Communication Competencies within the System of Continuing Education of Medical Doctors NS Zhuravskaya, MV Bektasova, BV Okun’, VA Yanovich ЗДОРОВЬЕ НАСЕЛЕНИЯ И СРЕДА ОБИТАНИЯ - ЗНиСО / PUBLIC HEALTH AND LIFE ENVIRONMENT.2021; : 95. CrossRef
Economic Aspects of Delivering Primary Care Services: An Evidence Synthesis to Inform Policy and Research Priorities LORCAN CLARKE, MICHAEL ANDERSON, ROB ANDERSON, MORTEN BONDE KLAUSEN, REBECCA FORMAN, JENNA KERNS, ADRIAN RABE, SØREN RUD KRISTENSEN, PAVLOS THEODORAKIS, JOSE VALDERAS, HANS KLUGE, ELIAS MOSSIALOS The Milbank Quarterly.2021; 99(4): 974. CrossRef
Knowledge Update on the Economic Evaluation of Pacemaker Telemonitoring Systems Antonio Lopez-Villegas, César Leal-Costa, Mercedes Perez-Heredia, Irene Villegas-Tripiana, Daniel Catalán-Matamoros International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2021; 18(22): 12120. CrossRef
Problems of development of telemedicine technologies in Russia through the prism of foreign experience O. S. Kobyakova, F. N. Kadyrov National Health Care (Russia).2021; 2(2): 13. CrossRef
Economic evaluation of E-health interventions compared with alternative treatments in older persons’ care: A systematic review Aziz Rezapour, Seyede Sedighe Hosseinijebeli, Saeed Bagheri Faradonbeh Journal of Education and Health Promotion.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
A Multicenter Case-Historical Control Study on Short-Term Outcomes of Tele-Intensive Care Unit Awad Al-Omari, Abbas Al Mutair, Maram Al Ammary, Fadi Aljamaan Telemedicine and e-Health.2020; 26(5): 645. CrossRef
Telemedicine in the OECD: An umbrella review of clinical and cost-effectiveness, patient experience and implementation Nkiruka D. Eze, Céu Mateus, Tiago Cravo Oliveira Hashiguchi, Hannah E. Carter PLOS ONE.2020; 15(8): e0237585. CrossRef
Understanding Medical Students’ Attitudes Toward Learning eHealth: Questionnaire Study Kjeld Vossen, Jan-Joost Rethans, Sander M J van Kuijk, Cees P van der Vleuten, Pieter L Kubben JMIR Medical Education.2020; 6(2): e17030. CrossRef
Тelemedicine technologies in occupational health and pathology Sergey A. Saiganov, Vadim I. Mazurov, Viktor V. Shilov, Sergey A. Gorbanev Hygiene and sanitation.2020; 99(9): 961. CrossRef
Barriers to use of remote monitoring technologies (RMT) used to support COVID-19 patients: A rapid review (Preprint) Elizabeth Houlding, Kedar Mate, Kim Engler, David Ortiz-Paredes, Marie-Pascale Pomey, Joseph Cox, Tarek Hijal, Bertrand Lebouché JMIR mHealth and uHealth.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Feasibility of support vector machine learning in age‐related macular degeneration using small sample yielding sparse optical coherence tomography data Gwenolé Quellec, Jens Kowal, Pascal W. Hasler, Hendrik P. N. Scholl, Sandrine Zweifel, Balaskas Konstantinos, João Emanuel Ramos de Carvalho, Tjebo Heeren, Catherine Egan, Adnan Tufail, Peter M. Maloca Acta Ophthalmologica.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Exploring the Impact of a Telehealth Care System on Organizational Capabilities and Organizational Performance from a Resource-Based Perspective Chun-Hsun Chen, Yu-Li Lan, Wei-Pang Yang, Fang-Ming Hsu, Chin-Lon Lin, Hsing-Chu Chen International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2019; 16(20): 3988. CrossRef
Addressing cost and time barriers in chronic disease management through telemedicine: an exploratory research in select low- and middle-income countries Saleem Sayani, Momina Muzammil, Karima Saleh, Abdul Muqeet, Fabiha Zaidi, Tehniat Shaikh Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Estado actual de la telemedicina: ¿dónde estamos y qué nos queda por hacer? Francesc García Cuyàs, Núria Vàzquez, Marc de San Pedro, Margarita Hospedales Medicina Clínica.2018; 150(4): 150. CrossRef
State of the art of the telemedicine. Where are we and what is pending to be done? Francesc García Cuyàs, Núria Vàzquez, Marc de San Pedro, Margarita Hospedales Medicina Clínica (English Edition).2018; 150(4): 150. CrossRef
Comparison between High- and Low-Cost Transmission of Tele-Anesthesia in Japan Yoh Sugawara, Tetsuya Miyashita, Yusuke Mizuno, Yusuke Nagamine, Tomoyuki Miyazaki, Ayako Kobayashi, Kentaro Tojo, Yasuhiro Iketani, Shunsuke Takaki, Takahisa Goto Journal of Healthcare Engineering.2018; 2018: 1. CrossRef
Comparative cost-benefit analysis of tele-homecare for community-dwelling elderly in Japan: Non-Government versus Government Supported Funding Models Miki Akiyama, Chon Abraham International Journal of Medical Informatics.2017; 104: 1. CrossRef
The use of telemedicine for delivering healthcare in Japan: Systematic review of literature published in Japanese and English languages Jun Ito, Sisira Edirippulige, Takeshi Aono, Nigel R Armfield Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare.2017; 23(10): 828. CrossRef
An economic evaluation is required in order to apply to the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) for a listing in the national drug formulary. To assist companies in preparing the necessary documents, HIRA published guidelines for the economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals in 2006. The guidelines are composed of two parts: guidance an explanatory notes. Each guideline reflects the best practice which meets both the theoretical consensus within the academic community and local situations, like data availability. To enhance the transparency of evaluation, guidelines emphasize the reproducibility of data and analysis result. That is, all evaluation processes are required to be described in enough detail to be replicated by reviewers. With growing experience and theoretical development in this area, HIRA guidelines will be revised periodically.
Summary
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Cost-Effectiveness and Value of Information of Cabozantinib Treatment for Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma After Failure of Prior Therapy in South Korea Siin Kim, Sola Han, Hyungtae Kim, Hae Sun Suh Applied Health Economics and Health Policy.2021; 19(4): 545. CrossRef
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Hypertension Screening in the Korea National Health Screening Program Hae-Young Lee, Seung Won Lee, Hyeon Chang Kim, Sang Hyun Ihm, Sung Ha Park, Tae Hyun Kim Korean Circulation Journal.2021; 51(7): 610. CrossRef
Analysis of Anesthesia Methods in Percutaneous Kyphoplasty for Treatment of Vertebral Compression Fractures Jie Liu, Lin Wang, Mei Chai, Junjie Kang, Jie Wang, Yanjun Zhang Journal of Healthcare Engineering.2020; 2020: 1. CrossRef
Efficacy, safety, and economic assessment of hominis placental pharmacopuncture for chronic temporomandibular disorder: a protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial Jongho Kim, Kyoung Sun Park, Yoon Jae Lee, Koh-Woon Kim, Jae-Heung Cho, In-Hyuk Ha Trials.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Cost-utility analysis of extensile lateral approach versus sinus tarsi approach in Sanders type II/III calcaneus fractures Zihua Li, Xinbo Wu, Haichao Zhou, Shaochen Xu, Fajiao Xiao, Hui Huang, Yunfeng Yang Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
A Cost-utility Analysis of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for L5-S1 Lumbar Disc Herniation Dongdong Wang, Wangcheng Xie, Wenxin Cao, Shisheng He, Guoxin Fan, Hailong Zhang Spine.2019; 44(8): 563. CrossRef
Cost-Utility Analysis of Sacubitril/Valsartan Use Compared With Standard Care in Chronic Heart Failure Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction in South Korea Sun-Kyeong Park, Sung-Hyun Hong, HyoJin Kim, Sungju Kim, Eui-Kyung Lee Clinical Therapeutics.2019; 41(6): 1066. CrossRef
Cost-effectiveness of antiviral prophylaxis during pregnancy for the prevention of perinatal hepatitis B infection in South Korea Donghoon Lee, Hyun-Young Shin, Sang Min Park Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
Single balloon versus double balloon bipedicular kyphoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zehao Jing, Jianli Dong, Zhengwei Li, Feng Nan European Spine Journal.2018; 27(10): 2550. CrossRef
Estimating utility weights and quality-adjusted life year loss for colorectal cancer-related health states in Korea Jin Yong Lee, Minsu Ock, Min-Woo Jo, Woo-Seung Son, Hyeon-Jeong Lee, Seon-Ha Kim, Hyun Joo Kim, Jong Lyul Lee Scientific Reports.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
Cost-Utility Analysis of Pedicle Screw Removal After Successful Posterior Instrumented Fusion in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Han-Dong Lee, Chang-Hoon Jeon, Nam-Su Chung, Young-Wook Seo Spine.2017; 42(15): E926. CrossRef
Estimation of utility weights for human papilloma virus-related health states according to disease severity Minsu Ock, Jeong-Yeol Park, Woo-Seung Son, Hyeon-Jeong Lee, Seon-Ha Kim, Min-Woo Jo Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.2016;[Epub] CrossRef
Assessment of Pharmacoeconomic Evaluations Submitted for Reimbursement in Korea Eun-Young Yim, Sang Hee Lim, Mi-Jeong Oh, Hye Kyung Park, Ji-Ryoun Gong, Sung Eun Park, So Young Yi Value in Health.2012; 15(1): S104. CrossRef
Since the positive listing system for prescription drug reimbursement has been introduced in Korea, the number of pharmacoeconomic evaluation studies has increased. However it is not clear if the quality of pharmacoeconomic evaluation study has improved. Due to the lack of randomized clinical studies in Korean health care setting, Korean economic evaluation studies have typically integrated the local cost data and foreign clinical data. Therefore methodological issues can be raised in regard to data coherence and consistency. But the quality of data was not questiened and the potential bias has not been investigated yet. Even though changes in policy have encouraged the undertaking of pharmacoeconomic evaluations, there is few public-side funding for validation study of cost-effectiveness models and data. Several companies perform economic evaluation studies to be submitted on behalf of their own products, but do not want the study results to be disclosed to the academic community or public. To improve the present conduct of pharmacoeconomic evaluations in Korea, various funding sources need to be developed, and, like other multidisciplinary areas, the experts in different fields of study should collaborate to ensure the validity and credibility of pharmacoeconomic evaluations.
Summary
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Barriers and Facilitators of Pharmacoeconomic Studies: A Review of Evidence from the Middle Eastern Countries Abdulaziz Ibrahim Alzarea, Yusra Habib Khan, Abdullah Salah Alanazi, Muhammad Hammad Butt, Ziyad Saeed Almalki, Abdullah K. AlAhmari, Saud Alsahali, Tauqeer Hussain Mallhi International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(13): 7862. CrossRef
Barriers to implementing pharmacoeconomics: interview study Qais Alefan, Esra’a Hamdouni, Hamza Alhamad, Tareq Mukattash, Karen Rascati Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research.2021; 21(1): 93. CrossRef
Pharmaceutical Policy Reforms to Regulate Drug Prices in the Asia Pacific Region: The Case of Australia, China, India, Malaysia, New Zealand, and South Korea Syed Shahzad Hasan, Chia Siang Kow, Dalia Dawoud, Omneya Mohamed, Darrin Baines, Zaheer-Ud-Din Babar Value in Health Regional Issues.2019; 18: 18. CrossRef
To curb a rapid increase in expenditures for pharmaceuticals, the Korean government introduced a positive list system and a negotiation process for drug prices at the end of 2006. Economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals has begun to have a pivotal role in the listing and pricing of drugs for the Korean National Health Insurance. There are some points to discuss regarding the use of economic evaluation in the listing and pricing in the context of the Korean system. First, the listing and pricing processes have been fragmented, evoking complaints from pharmaceutical companies and delaying the access of new drugs to patients. Second, there is a concern that the positive list system may limit the range and availability of drugs for patients to choose for treatment. Third, the time schedule for de-listing of existing drugs may not be realistic. Fourth, it is not always easy to provide reliable evidence of cost-effectiveness due to a lack of materials. Fifth, there is no consensus on the range of the ICER (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio) acceptable to the Korean society. In conclusion, in the near future, it will be necessary to evaluate the achievements that the economic evaluation has provided to the Korean society.
Summary
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Cost-effectiveness of rhythm control strategy: Ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs for treating atrial fibrillation in Korea based on real-world data Woojin Kim, Min Kim, Yun Tae Kim, Woongbi Park, Jin-bae Kim, Changsoo Kim, Boyoung Joung Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Policy Suggestions to Improve Patient Access to New Drugs in Korea Yoona Choi, Howard Lee Korean Journal of Clinical Pharmacy.2021; 31(1): 1. CrossRef
Consistency of new drug pricing in Korea: Bridging variations among personnel in price negotiations Hye-Young Kwon, Jinhyun Kim Health Policy.2020; 124(9): 965. CrossRef
How Much Amount of Socioeconomic Loss Is Caused by Digestive Diseases? Kyung Sik Park The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2011; 58(6): 297. CrossRef
Health Care Costs of Digestive Diseases in Korea Hye-kyung Jung, BoHyoung Jang, Youn Hee Kim, JooYeon Park, Sun Young Park, Mi-Hee Nam, Myung-Gyu Choi The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2011; 58(6): 323. CrossRef