Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

JPMPH : Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Prev Med Public Health > Volume 59(2); 2026 > Article
Brief Report
Long Working Hours and Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease Among Japanese Workers: The Jichi Medical School Cohort Study
Mayumi Saiki1,2orcid, Akizumi Tsutsumi3orcid, Jian Li1,4orcid
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health 2026;59(2):211-218.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.25.577
Published online: February 5, 2026
  • 772 Views
  • 98 Download

1Joe C. Wen School of Nursing, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA

2School of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA

3Department of Public Health, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan

4Departments of Environmental Health Sciences and Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Corresponding author: Jian Li, Departments of Environmental Health Sciences and Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, 650 Charles E. Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA, E-mail: jianli2019@ucla.edu
• Received: July 18, 2025   • Revised: September 30, 2025   • Accepted: November 29, 2025

Copyright © 2026 The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

prev
  • Objectives
    Karoshi, or “death from overwork,” has been recognized for decades; however, epidemiological findings regarding long working hours (LWH) and ischemic heart disease (IHD) remain inconsistent. This study aimed to provide new evidence on the association between LWH and IHD, while accounting for job strain among Japanese workers, both male and female.
  • Methods
    This study utilized data from 6670 workers participating in the Jichi Medical School Cohort Study. Baseline working hours were categorized as <5.0, 5.0 to 6.9, 7.0 to 8.9 (reference), 9.0 to 10.9, and ≥11.0 hr/day. Fatal and non-fatal incident IHD cases were determined during follow-up using International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision codes. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine associations, adjusting for socio-demographic factors, lifestyle behaviors, cardiometabolic characteristics, and job strain.
  • Results
    During a mean follow-up of 12 years, 58 incident IHD cases (42 male and 16 female) were documented. Long working hours (≥11.0 hr/day) were significantly associated with an increased risk of IHD in the total sample (hazard ratio, 2.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.15 to 7.39), and the overall pattern of associations was similar in sex-stratified analyses.
  • Conclusions
    These findings suggest that LWH independently increases the risk of IHD among Japanese workers, even after adjustment for job strain, underscoring the importance of managing working hours to reduce karoshi in both male and female workers.
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD), including ischemic heart disease (IHD), represent the leading cause of death globally, and research supports that long working hours (LWH), defined as ≥55 hr/wk, are a moderate risk factor for IHD [1,2]. LWH have been reported to be particularly prevalent among male workers and those in early middle age; they are also more common in Southeast Asia, whereas prevalence is lower in Europe [2].
In Japan, several studies have examined the associations between LWH and IHD [36]. However, most studies have focused only on male workers [3,4,6]. Although one study included females, its sample was still male-dominant, with males accounting for 98% of participants [5]. Moreover, these studies did not reflect the recent increase in female employment in Japan, which has exceeded 80% [7]. Prior research has indicated that daily LWH ≥11 hours [3,6], weekly LWH ≥55 hours [5], and weekly LWH ≥61 hours [4] are significantly associated with an increased risk of IHD among male workers.
Another work-related psychosocial factor, job strain (i.e., high job demand and low job control) [8], has been shown to contribute to the global burden of CVD and IHD [9]. However, none of the previous studies assessed the independent effect of LWH while accounting for job strain [36]. Therefore, this investigation aimed to examine whether LWH are associated with IHD independently of job strain and whether these associations differ by sex among Japanese workers.
Study Sample
Data were drawn from the Jichi Medical School (JMS) Cohort Study, which investigated lifestyle factors, socioeconomic factors, and CVD risk factors in the general Japanese population [10]. This multicenter study recruited participants aged ≥18 years from 12 rural districts. In total, 12 490 individuals participated at baseline, conducted between April 1992 and July 1995. Participants were followed through the end of December 2005. At baseline, participants completed a standardized questionnaire and underwent a physical examination [10]. During annual follow-up, information on new diagnoses of IHD was collected. Additional details have been reported elsewhere [10].
Among the 12 490 baseline participants, 4536 who were retired or unemployed and 141 with missing or zero working hours were excluded. An additional 729 participants with missing covariate data were excluded, yielding 7084 participants with complete covariate data. Participants with a history of angina, myocardial infarction, other heart diseases, stroke, or cancer were then excluded, resulting in a final analytic sample of 6670 participants (Figure 1).
Working Hours
Participants were interviewed about their work-related activities at baseline. They reported the average number of daily hours spent on work-related activities, which were summed to calculate total daily working hours. Daily working hours were then categorized into 5 groups: <5.0, 5.0 to 6.9, 7.0 to 8.9 (reference), 9.0 to 10.9, and ≥11 hours, in accordance with a previous study [6].
Covariates
All covariates were measured at baseline, including age (<40, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, or ≥70 years), sex (male or female), age at completion of education (≤15, 16–18, or ≥19 years), occupation (professional/technician/clerk, sales/service workers, farming/forestry/fishery, and security/transportation/communications/craft workers/laborers), managerial position (yes and no), smoking (lifetime non-smoker, former smoker, and current smoker), alcohol consumption (non-drinker, light drinker, and heavy drinker), exercise (continuous physical activity index calculated by multiplying activity duration and weight factors based on the intensity of different physical activities), hypertension (yes or no), diabetes mellitus (DM; yes and no), body mass index (BMI; continuous), total cholesterol (TC; continuous), and community (12 rural districts). Job strain was defined as the ratio of job demand to job control (continuous); the total job demand score was divided by the total job control score, adjusted for differences in item counts [11].
Ascertainment of Ischemic Heart Disease
During follow-up, when an episode of IHD (non-fatal or fatal) was suspected, medical records from hospitals or death certificates from public health centers were obtained for review. Diagnoses were adjudicated by a diagnostic committee composed of radiologists, cardiologists, and neurologists. In line with prior research, IHD was defined as conditions with International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision codes I20 to I25 [1]. Total IHD cases were defined as the sum of non-fatal and fatal cases.
Statistical Analysis
First, descriptive statistics were generated to compare baseline characteristics across the 5 working-hours groups, using analysis of variance for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were then fitted, with results reported as hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical significance was set at p-value <0.05. In these analyses, deaths from causes other than IHD were censored, and fatal IHD events were censored in the analysis of non-fatal IHD. Unadjusted results were reported as model 0. Model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, age at completion of education, occupation, managerial position, smoking status, alcohol consumption, exercise, BMI, hypertension, DM, TC, and community, in accordance with a previous study [11]. Model 2 additionally adjusted for job strain. An interaction term among working hours, sex, and job strain was included to test potential effect modification by sex and job strain. Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
Ethics Statement
The study design and procedures were reviewed and approved by each municipal government and the Ethics Committee for Epidemiological Research at Jichi Medical School. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Table 1 presents baseline characteristics stratified by working hours. Among the 6670 participants, most individuals across age groups worked 7.0–11.0 hr/day. Among those working ≥11.0 hr/day, the highest proportions were in the 40–49 and 50–59 age groups. Males were more prevalent than females in the longer working-hours categories. Participants working ≥11.0 hr/day were most frequently employed in farming, forestry, and fishing, followed by sales and service; occupational distributions are shown in Supplemental Material 1. Participants who were not in managerial positions or business owners generally worked longer hours. Most participants completed their education by age 18, and age at completion of education did not differ by working-hours category. Most participants were lifetime non-smokers or former smokers, and most were non-drinkers or light drinkers. Workers with longer working hours were less likely to exercise. No obvious differences were observed in BMI, TC, DM, or hypertension across working-hours categories. Participants with LWH experienced higher job strain.
During follow-up, 58 new IHD cases were identified, corresponding to an incidence rate of 0.73 per 1000 person-years. Total follow-up time was 79 809.86 person-years, with a mean follow-up of 12.08 years. The number of events and follow-up person-time by covariate categories are presented in Supplemental Material 2. The median time to IHD onset was 7.13 years. Figure 2 presents the HRs and 95% CIs for IHD. Working ≥11 hr/day was associated with an increased risk of IHD in the univariate model (Supplemental Material 3), and this association was further strengthened after adjustment in model 1 (HR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.15 to 7.37). After additional adjustment for job strain in model 2, the association remained robust and statistically significant (HR, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.15 to 7.39), whereas job strain was not significantly associated with IHD risk (Supplemental Material 4).
The interaction between working hours and sex was not significant (p=0.54). Results of the sex-stratified analyses are shown in Figure 2. Because the number of incident IHD cases was limited (42 in male and 16 in female), the associations did not reach statistical significance. However, a similar pattern was observed in both male and female, with elevated HRs among those working ≥11 hr/day (male: HR, 2.62; 95% CI, 0.88 to 7.83; female: HR, 3.94; 95% CI, 0.53 to 29.52) (Supplemental Material 3). In addition, the interaction between working hours and job strain was not significant (p=0.41).
To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the independent effect of LWH on IHD, beyond job strain, among Japanese workers. Previous studies have reported positive associations between LWH and IHD in this demographic [36]. The present findings indicate that LWH were independently associated with IHD after accounting for job strain. In this study, job strain was not significantly associated with IHD, which may suggest cultural differences in the explanatory value of job strain for IHD development between Western and Eastern working populations. Notably, the HR in model 2 did not attenuate after adjustment for job strain compared with model 1, indicating that any mediating effect of job strain was minimal. Furthermore, the moderating role of job strain between LWH and IHD risk was not supported, based on the non-significant interaction test.
Similar trends were observed in both male and female, consistent with previous Japanese studies reporting associations between LWH and IHD in male workers [36]. Additional analyses suggested no evidence of sex differences in the association between LWH and IHD (p=0.54). Although the risk of IHD was increased in both male and female, the 95% CIs were wide because of the small number of incident cases. Our results add to the limited evidence on the risk associated with LWH among female workers in Japan and are consistent with prior evidence suggesting similar IHD risk related to LWH exposure in male and female (p=0.99 for sex differences) [1].
A potential explanation for the effects of LWH on IHD may involve behavioral and physiological changes associated with LWH [1]. One behavioral pathway relates to meal selection. Research has shown that LWH may increase sodium intake due to the limited time available for cooking [12]. Additionally, the benefits of exercise are well documented; regular physical activity helps prevent atherosclerosis and improves cardiovascular health [13]. As shown in Table 1, workers with LWH were less likely to engage in exercise, which is a risk factor for IHD. Regarding physiological changes, LWH may activate the sympathetic nervous system, leading to elevated blood pressure and increased heart rate [14]. Moreover, LWH are significantly associated with elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels [15] and a higher risk of glucose intolerance [16]. These conditions increase the risk of atherosclerosis and predispose individuals to IHD [17].
The strengths of this prospective study should be highlighted. First, the JMS Cohort Study was a multicenter study that recruited participants from 12 districts in Japan. Although most previous Japanese studies included predominantly male participants [36], the JMS Cohort Study included both male and female, enhancing generalizability to the Japanese population. Second, the JMS Cohort Study had a long follow-up duration (mean, 12.08 years). The median time to IHD onset was 7.13 years, suggesting that follow-up was sufficient to capture the latency between exposure to LWH and IHD development. Third, IHD diagnoses were adjudicated by a diagnostic committee using medical records and death certificates, which likely improved the accuracy of outcome classification. Fourth, Cox proportional hazards models were used to account for time-to-event outcomes and censoring. In addition, a broad set of covariates associated with IHD was included, minimizing potential confounding. Importantly, job strain was incorporated into the analyses, as described above. Finally, the 12-year follow-up enabled capture of incident IHD events, thereby improving statistical power.
The limitations of this study should also be addressed. First, data regarding working hours were collected only at baseline in the JMS Cohort Study; thus, changes in working hours, duration of exposure to LWH, timing, and shift patterns during the 12-year follow-up could not be assessed. This may have introduced bias by failing to capture cumulative exposure to LWH. Second, working hours were self-reported and may have been subject to recall bias. However, the validity and reproducibility of self-reported working hours are considered relatively high [18]. Third, the data were collected from 1992 to 2005, which may limit applicability to current working conditions. For example, the number of farmers has decreased substantially since 2005, from 2.2 million in 2005 to 1.2 million in 2023 [19].
The work-style reform law was enforced in Japan in 2019, and the proportion of full-time workers with LWH >60 hr/wk decreased from 17.0% in 2005 to 8.9% in 2022 [20]. The number of compensated work-related CVD cases (i.e., karoshi) also showed a declining trend, from 330 cases in 2005 to 241 in 2024. These data suggest that policy-level interventions targeting LWH in Japan have substantially reduced work-related CVD cases compared with 20 years ago. The present results suggest that LWH are a significant factor in increasing IHD risk among Japanese workers, underscoring the importance of managing working hours to prevent karoshi.
Due to the proprietary nature of the dataset and the need to protect study participant privacy, the raw data from the Jichi Medical School Cohort Study cannot be made openly available at this time. Further information about the data and conditions for access is available from Dr. Akizumi Tsutsumi (akizumi@kitasato-u.ac.jp) at Kitasato University School of Medicine. The authors will provide the SAS syntax supporting the conclusions of this article without undue reservation. Requests for access to the SAS syntax should be directed to Dr. Jian Li (jianli2019@ucla.edu) at the University of California, Los Angeles.
Supplemental materials are available at https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.25.577.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest associated with the material presented in this paper.

Funding

The Jichi Medical School Cohort Study received a grant-in-aid from the Foundation for the Development of the Community, Tochigi, Japan. This study was partially supported by the Occupational and Environmental Health Nursing Program of the Southern California Education and Research Center (SCERC) under the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)/National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) (Grant Agreement No. T42 OH008412). The study was also partially supported by a research grant from CDC/NIOSH (Award No.: R21OH012446).

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate the JMS Cohort Study team for their efforts on this study.

The sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the article; and decision to submit the article for publication. The contents of this study are solely the authors’ responsibility and do not necessarily represent the official views of the US CDC/NIOSH.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Li J, Tsutsumi A. Data curation: Tsutsumi A, Saiki M, Li J. Formal analysis: Saiki M, Li J. Funding acquisition: Li J, Saiki M. Methodology: Li J, Tsutsumi A, Saiki M. Project administration: Tsutsumi A, Li J. Visualization: Saiki M. Writing – original draft: Saiki M, Li J. Writing – review & editing: Saiki M, Tsutsumi A, Li J.

Figure 1
Flow chart of study sample selection.
jpmph-25-577f1.jpg
Figure 2
Hazard ratios (HRs) of ischemic heart disease by daily working hours (HR and 95% confidence intervals) for (A) all participant and (B) sex-stratified analysis (model 2). *p<0.05.
jpmph-25-577f2.jpg
jpmph-25-577f3.jpg
Table 1
Characteristics of the study sample at baseline stratified by daily working hours (n=6670)
Characteristics Daily working hours (hr)
Total <5.0 5.0–6.9 7.0–8.9 9.0–10.9 ≥11.0 p-value1
No. of participants 6670 190 516 2180 2339 1445
Age (y) <0.001
 <40 720 (10.8) 11 (5.8) 64 (12.4) 242 (11.1) 235 (10.1) 168 (11.6)
 40–49 1840 (27.6) 37 (19.5) 103 (20.0) 606 (27.8) 657 (28.1) 437 (30.2)
 50–59 1972 (29.6) 37 (19.5) 113 (21.9) 649 (29.8) 722 (30.9) 451 (31.2)
 60–69 1954 (29.3) 89 (46.8) 206 (39.9) 627 (28.8) 674 (28.8) 358 (24.8)
 ≥70 184 (2.8) 16 (8.4) 30 (5.8) 56 (2.6) 51 (2.2) 31 (2.2)
Sex <0.001
 Male 3289 (49.3) 56 (29.5) 146 (28.3) 990 (45.4) 1312 (56.1) 785 (54.3)
 Female 3381 (50.7) 134 (70.5) 370 (71.7) 1190 (54.6) 1027 (43.9) 660 (45.7)
Occupation <0.001
 Professionals/technicians/clerks 879 (13.2) 20 (10.5) 60 (11.6) 381 (17.5) 228 (11.9) 140 (9.7)
 Sales/service workers 1379 (20.7) 57 (30.0) 113 (21.9) 364 (16.7) 455 (19.4) 390 (27.0)
 Farming/forestry/fishery 2642 (39.6) 92 (48.4) 247 (47.9) 759 (34.8) 931 (39.8) 613 (42.4)
 Security/transportation/communications/craft workers/laborers 1770 (26.5) 21 (11.1) 96 (18.6) 676 (31.0) 675 (28.9) 302 (20.9)
Manager/business owner <0.001
 No 4150 (62.2) 133 (70.0) 379 (73.5) 1433 (65.7) 1402 (59.9) 803 (55.6)
 Yes 2520 (37.8) 57 (30.0) 137 (26.6) 747 (34.3) 937 (40.1) 642 (44.4)
Education (y) 0.331
 ≤15 2937 (44.0) 96 (50.5) 229 (44.4) 952 (43.7) 1001 (42.8) 659 (45.6)
 16–18 2940 (44.1) 77 (40.5) 227 (44.0) 949 (43.5) 1066 (45.6) 621 (43.0)
 ≥19 793 (11.9) 17 (9.0) 60 (11.6) 279 (12.8) 272 (11.6) 165 (11.4)
Job strain 0.87±0.26 0.79±0.28 0.80±0.28 0.88±0.27 0.88±0.25 0.87±0.24 <0.001
Smoking status <0.001
 Lifetime non-smoker 3829 (57.4) 129 (67.9) 373 (72.3) 1289 (59.1) 1248 (53.4) 790 (54.7)
 Former smoker 917 (13.8) 22 (11.6) 52 (10.1) 274 (12.6) 336 (15.7) 203 (14.1)
 Current smoker 1924 (28.9) 39 (20.5) 91 (17.6) 617 (28.3) 725 (31.0) 452 (31.3)
Alcohol consumption (g/day) <0.001
 Non-drinker 3250 (48.7) 119 (62.6) 324 (62.8) 1083 (49.7) 1053 (45.0) 671 (46.4)
 Light drinker (<28.9) 1766 (26.5) 47 (24.7) 116 (22.5) 580 (26.6) 640 (27.4) 383 (26.5)
 Heavy drinker (≥28.9) 1654 (24.8) 24 (12.6) 76 (14.7) 517 (23.7) 646 (27.6) 391 (27.1)
Exercise (physical activity index) 9.11±3.74 17.25±4.61 13.71±2.88 10.68±2.29 8.54±2.14 4.96±2.45 <0.001
Body mass index 22.99±2.92 23.27±3.16 22.97±3.22 23.07±2.95 22.94±2.83 22.92±2.87 0.299
Total cholesterol 189.31±34.28 193.12±33.61 189.60±35.73 189.98±34.71 189.25±33.49 187.79±34.43 0.194
Hypertension 0.118
 No 5848 (87.7) 162 (85.3) 437 (84.7) 1904 (87.3) 2066 (88.3) 1279 (88.5)
 Yes 822 (12.3) 28 (14.7) 79 (15.3) 276 (12.7) 273 (11.7) 166 (11.5)
Diabetes mellitus 0.367
 No 6453 (96.8) 184 (96.8) 507 (98.3) 2109 (96.7) 2257 (96.5) 1396 (96.6)
 Yes 217 (3.3) 6 (3.2) 9 (1.7) 71 (3.3) 82 (3.5) 49 (3.4)
Community <0.001
 1 577 (8.7) 21 (11.1) 51 (9.9) 207 (9.5) 167 (7.1) 131 (9.1)
 2 1668 (25.0) 42 (22.1) 170 (33.0) 517 (23.7) 672 (28.7) 267 (18.5)
 3 1135 (17.0) 38 (20.0) 95 (18.4) 374 (17.2) 372 (15.9) 256 (17.7)
 4 212 (3.2) 3 (1.6) 8 (1.6) 48 (2.2) 101 (4.3) 52 (3.6)
 5 833 (12.5) 20 (10.5) 55 (10.7) 264 (12.1) 281 (12.0) 213 (14.5)
 6 731 (11.0) 18 (9.5) 51 (9.9) 323 (14.8) 250 (10.7) 89 (6.2)
 7 149 (2.2) 9 (4.7) 21 (4.1) 66 (3.0) 32 (1.4) 21 (1.5)
 8 618 (9.3) 19 (10.0) 36 (7.0) 158 (7.3) 214 (9.2) 191 (13.2)
 9 200 (3.0) 2 (1.1) 11 (2.1) 69 (3.2) 74 (3.2) 44 (3.0)
 10 142 (2.1) 8 (4.2) 6 (1.2) 35 (1.6) 62 (2.7) 31 (2.2)
 11 96 (1.4) 3 (1.6) 2 (0.4) 17 (0.8) 33 (1.4) 41 (2.8)
 12 309 (4.6) 7 (3.7) 10 (1.9) 102 (4.7) 81 (3.5) 109 (7.5)

Values are presented as number (%) or mean±standard deviation.

1 Chi-square tests for categorical variables and analysis of variance for continuous variables were used to test differences between daily working hours.

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      • PubReader PubReader
      • Cite
        CITE
        export Copy
        Close
      • XML DownloadXML Download
      Figure
      • 0
      • 1
      • 2
      Long Working Hours and Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease Among Japanese Workers: The Jichi Medical School Cohort Study
      Image Image Image
      Figure 1 Flow chart of study sample selection.
      Figure 2 Hazard ratios (HRs) of ischemic heart disease by daily working hours (HR and 95% confidence intervals) for (A) all participant and (B) sex-stratified analysis (model 2). *p<0.05.
      Graphical abstract
      Long Working Hours and Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease Among Japanese Workers: The Jichi Medical School Cohort Study
      Characteristics Daily working hours (hr)
      Total <5.0 5.0–6.9 7.0–8.9 9.0–10.9 ≥11.0 p-value1
      No. of participants 6670 190 516 2180 2339 1445
      Age (y) <0.001
       <40 720 (10.8) 11 (5.8) 64 (12.4) 242 (11.1) 235 (10.1) 168 (11.6)
       40–49 1840 (27.6) 37 (19.5) 103 (20.0) 606 (27.8) 657 (28.1) 437 (30.2)
       50–59 1972 (29.6) 37 (19.5) 113 (21.9) 649 (29.8) 722 (30.9) 451 (31.2)
       60–69 1954 (29.3) 89 (46.8) 206 (39.9) 627 (28.8) 674 (28.8) 358 (24.8)
       ≥70 184 (2.8) 16 (8.4) 30 (5.8) 56 (2.6) 51 (2.2) 31 (2.2)
      Sex <0.001
       Male 3289 (49.3) 56 (29.5) 146 (28.3) 990 (45.4) 1312 (56.1) 785 (54.3)
       Female 3381 (50.7) 134 (70.5) 370 (71.7) 1190 (54.6) 1027 (43.9) 660 (45.7)
      Occupation <0.001
       Professionals/technicians/clerks 879 (13.2) 20 (10.5) 60 (11.6) 381 (17.5) 228 (11.9) 140 (9.7)
       Sales/service workers 1379 (20.7) 57 (30.0) 113 (21.9) 364 (16.7) 455 (19.4) 390 (27.0)
       Farming/forestry/fishery 2642 (39.6) 92 (48.4) 247 (47.9) 759 (34.8) 931 (39.8) 613 (42.4)
       Security/transportation/communications/craft workers/laborers 1770 (26.5) 21 (11.1) 96 (18.6) 676 (31.0) 675 (28.9) 302 (20.9)
      Manager/business owner <0.001
       No 4150 (62.2) 133 (70.0) 379 (73.5) 1433 (65.7) 1402 (59.9) 803 (55.6)
       Yes 2520 (37.8) 57 (30.0) 137 (26.6) 747 (34.3) 937 (40.1) 642 (44.4)
      Education (y) 0.331
       ≤15 2937 (44.0) 96 (50.5) 229 (44.4) 952 (43.7) 1001 (42.8) 659 (45.6)
       16–18 2940 (44.1) 77 (40.5) 227 (44.0) 949 (43.5) 1066 (45.6) 621 (43.0)
       ≥19 793 (11.9) 17 (9.0) 60 (11.6) 279 (12.8) 272 (11.6) 165 (11.4)
      Job strain 0.87±0.26 0.79±0.28 0.80±0.28 0.88±0.27 0.88±0.25 0.87±0.24 <0.001
      Smoking status <0.001
       Lifetime non-smoker 3829 (57.4) 129 (67.9) 373 (72.3) 1289 (59.1) 1248 (53.4) 790 (54.7)
       Former smoker 917 (13.8) 22 (11.6) 52 (10.1) 274 (12.6) 336 (15.7) 203 (14.1)
       Current smoker 1924 (28.9) 39 (20.5) 91 (17.6) 617 (28.3) 725 (31.0) 452 (31.3)
      Alcohol consumption (g/day) <0.001
       Non-drinker 3250 (48.7) 119 (62.6) 324 (62.8) 1083 (49.7) 1053 (45.0) 671 (46.4)
       Light drinker (<28.9) 1766 (26.5) 47 (24.7) 116 (22.5) 580 (26.6) 640 (27.4) 383 (26.5)
       Heavy drinker (≥28.9) 1654 (24.8) 24 (12.6) 76 (14.7) 517 (23.7) 646 (27.6) 391 (27.1)
      Exercise (physical activity index) 9.11±3.74 17.25±4.61 13.71±2.88 10.68±2.29 8.54±2.14 4.96±2.45 <0.001
      Body mass index 22.99±2.92 23.27±3.16 22.97±3.22 23.07±2.95 22.94±2.83 22.92±2.87 0.299
      Total cholesterol 189.31±34.28 193.12±33.61 189.60±35.73 189.98±34.71 189.25±33.49 187.79±34.43 0.194
      Hypertension 0.118
       No 5848 (87.7) 162 (85.3) 437 (84.7) 1904 (87.3) 2066 (88.3) 1279 (88.5)
       Yes 822 (12.3) 28 (14.7) 79 (15.3) 276 (12.7) 273 (11.7) 166 (11.5)
      Diabetes mellitus 0.367
       No 6453 (96.8) 184 (96.8) 507 (98.3) 2109 (96.7) 2257 (96.5) 1396 (96.6)
       Yes 217 (3.3) 6 (3.2) 9 (1.7) 71 (3.3) 82 (3.5) 49 (3.4)
      Community <0.001
       1 577 (8.7) 21 (11.1) 51 (9.9) 207 (9.5) 167 (7.1) 131 (9.1)
       2 1668 (25.0) 42 (22.1) 170 (33.0) 517 (23.7) 672 (28.7) 267 (18.5)
       3 1135 (17.0) 38 (20.0) 95 (18.4) 374 (17.2) 372 (15.9) 256 (17.7)
       4 212 (3.2) 3 (1.6) 8 (1.6) 48 (2.2) 101 (4.3) 52 (3.6)
       5 833 (12.5) 20 (10.5) 55 (10.7) 264 (12.1) 281 (12.0) 213 (14.5)
       6 731 (11.0) 18 (9.5) 51 (9.9) 323 (14.8) 250 (10.7) 89 (6.2)
       7 149 (2.2) 9 (4.7) 21 (4.1) 66 (3.0) 32 (1.4) 21 (1.5)
       8 618 (9.3) 19 (10.0) 36 (7.0) 158 (7.3) 214 (9.2) 191 (13.2)
       9 200 (3.0) 2 (1.1) 11 (2.1) 69 (3.2) 74 (3.2) 44 (3.0)
       10 142 (2.1) 8 (4.2) 6 (1.2) 35 (1.6) 62 (2.7) 31 (2.2)
       11 96 (1.4) 3 (1.6) 2 (0.4) 17 (0.8) 33 (1.4) 41 (2.8)
       12 309 (4.6) 7 (3.7) 10 (1.9) 102 (4.7) 81 (3.5) 109 (7.5)
      Table 1 Characteristics of the study sample at baseline stratified by daily working hours (n=6670)

      Values are presented as number (%) or mean±standard deviation.

      Chi-square tests for categorical variables and analysis of variance for continuous variables were used to test differences between daily working hours.


      JPMPH : Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
      TOP