INTRODUCTION
Although the significant advantages of breastfeeding for children’s survival, growth, and development have been widely recognized, many mothers in developing countries do not breastfeed their infants as recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations Children’s Fund [
1]. The recommendation for optimal breastfeeding includes early initiation of breastfeeding (EIBF), exclusive breastfeeding (EBF), and continued breastfeeding to age 2 years or beyond [
2]. Optimal breastfeeding practices could prevent more than 800 000 deaths in children under 5 and 20 000 deaths in women due to breast cancer annually [
3]. In contrast, not breastfeeding is associated with annual economic losses of around 302 billion US dollar and lower intelligence [
4].
This study focuses on the Republic of Indonesia, the largest country in Southeast Asia, where breastfeeding is a norm; almost all children are breastfed [
5]. However, 24 children out of 1000 live births die before their fifth birthday, and 32% of children are stunted in Indonesia [
6]. As the prevalence of wasting and underweight is 10.2% and 17.7%, respectively, child undernutrition remains a public health problem that cannot be ignored [
6]. Breastfeeding is among the best-buy interventions to tackle child malnutrition [
7].
Indonesia is on course to achieve the World Health Assembly target by 2025, with half of all infants receiving EBF [
8]. However, more efforts are needed to reach the national target of 60% by 2024 [
9]. Similarly, EIBF practice has moderately improved over time, with the latest figure of 57% [
6]. Therefore, more effective interventions are pivotal to achieving the global target of 70% [
1]. In 2018, 77% of mothers in Indonesia practiced continued breastfeeding at 1 year (CBF-1); as for continued breastfeeding at 2 years (CBF-2), the prevalence was 55% [
10]. No national targets have been set for CBF-1 and CBF-2, but it is clear that more strategic interventions targeting both breastfeeding practices are required to reach the global targets of 80% and 60%, respectively [
1]. To formulate effective interventions improving breastfeeding practices, understanding the barriers and facilitators of each breastfeeding indicator is crucial, as a mother’s decision to breastfeeding is determined by numerous factors that can vary between and within nationalities [
4]. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze factors associated with optimal breastfeeding practices in Indonesia.
RESULTS
The average age of the EIBF sample was 11.6 months; as for EBF, CBF-1, and CBF-2, the averages ages were 2.8 months, 13.6 months, and 21.0 months, respectively (
Table 1). Overall, the distribution of the respondent characteristics in percentages was similar across the outcomes. Most infants were born to mothers aged 20–34 years old, and just under 60% were perceived as having an average birth size. First-born infants accounted for approximately one-third of the respondents. The number of respondents residing in rural areas was almost equal to those in urban areas. Over half (57.5–60.0%) of mothers had finished secondary school, and more than half were housewives. The proportions of respondents coming from poor, middle, and rich families were almost evenly distributed. The percentage of smoking mothers ranged from 0.9% to 2.2%, and almost all mothers received 4 or more ANC visits and delivered at a health facility. Around 60% of the infants experienced skin-to-skin contact, and about 30% of mothers did not receive a postnatal visit.
Table 2 presents the final model for the determinants of EIBF, EBF, CBF-1, and CBF-2. Small perceived birth size, first child, and cesarean delivery were barriers to EIBF, while skin-to-skin contact increased the odds of EIBF (aOR, 2.17; 95% CI, 2.23 to 2.89). Older children were less likely to receive EBF. As with EIBF, being a first-born child was also a barrier to EBF. The other barriers were mothers working outside the agricultural sector, middle household wealth index, and smoking mothers.
Infants’ age was among the determinants of CBF-2; a 1-month increase in the infant’s age was associated with a 15% decrease in the odds of CBF-2 (aOR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.99); however, this did not affect CBF-1. A higher level of maternal education was negatively associated with CBF-2. In contrast, this variable had no significant association in the model for CBF-1. The last identified determinant of CBF-2 was the time of the first postnatal visit, which was also among the facilitators of CBF-1. The other factors associated with CBF-1 were a non-first child with a birth interval ≥2 years, a low-income family, mothers with other occupations, and vaginal delivery.
DISCUSSION
Our findings revealed that perceived birth size, birth pattern, type of delivery, and skin-to-skin contact were associated with EIBF. EBF was influenced by the infant’s age, birth pattern, mother’s occupation, wealth index, and maternal smoking. Postnatal care improved the likelihood of both CBF-1 and CBF-2. Birth pattern, the mother’s occupation, and wealth index were also among the determinants of CBF-1. The other determinants of CBF-2 included the mother’s education and infant’s age.
The present analysis showed that older children had lower odds of EBF and CBF-2. A large body of evidence has also confirmed that younger children are more likely to be exclusively breastfed than older ones [
12,
14,
15]. A possible explanation is mothers’ perception that giving only breastmilk is insufficient as infants grow larger [
16]. Therefore, educational messages and supports clarifying this misperception could be among the key strategies to improve EBF practice. It is important to note that mothers of older infants should be given more attention. Consistent with this study, previous analyses also found that the infant’s age was negatively associated with CBF-2 [
12]. A reason could be the rapid growth of formula feeding practice, and giving formula to infants at any age decreased the odds of breastfeeding at 2 years [
17,
18].
In line with previous studies, infants perceived as small were less likely to receive EIBF [
12,
15,
19]. Small birth size as perceived by the mothers may indicate that the infants had low birth weight, which was a risk factor of EIBF [
20]. Small newborns are more likely to be physically immature and lack coordination in suckling, respiratory system, and reflexes, which could delay the infant’s ability to start breastfeeding within 1 hour [
21]. Nevertheless, this study found that the infant’s birth weight did not affect EBF and continued breastfeeding practices. This finding, which corresponds to previous studies, allows mothers to achieve EBF and continued breastfeeding although their infants were smaller than average [
12,
20].
This study showed that being a first child was negatively associated with EIBF, EBF, and CBF-1. Similarly, studies in South Asia and West Africa also reported that the birth interval and birth order were associated with EIBF [
19,
22]. Findings from studies in Ethiopia and India also concluded that birth order and birth interval were among the predictors of EBF [
23,
24]. First-time mothers are less likely to use healthcare services regarding delivery and breastfeeding; therefore, the prevalence of EIBF and EBF was lower in this group. Another explanation could be their inexperience in breastfeeding, making them lack confidence in following the breastfeeding recommendations.
Inconsistent findings have been reported regarding the association between maternal education and breastfeeding practices. Evidence from this analysis and studies in Sri Lanka and Bangladesh showed that maternal education was associated with neither EIBF nor EBF [
20,
25]. Even so, that variable was negatively associated with CBF-2; mothers with the highest education level had the lowest odds of CBF-2. This finding is consistent with a study in India [
26]. Generally, highly educated mothers in low-to-middle income countries (LMICs) are less likely to breastfeed; they tend to opt for breastmilk substitutes due to their increased purchasing power. It is also possible that poorer mothers will switch to substitutes as their income increases [
3].
EBF and CBF-1 were less common among mothers working outside the agricultural sector than non-working mothers, in line with findings from studies in LMICs [
27]. A cohort study in Australia also showed that mothers going back to work by 1 year after delivery had lower odds of CBF-1 than those not returning to work within that period [
18]; an explanation could relate to the mother’s workload and the short duration maternity leave. Similar to maternal employment, the household wealth index also affected both EBF and CBF-1; mothers from poorer families were more likely to follow EBF and CBF-1 recommendations, consistent with a Nepalese study for EBF [
12]. In LMICs, breastfeeding was found to be more common among mothers from a lower economic background [
3]; since they may have had no alternatives for feeding their infants. In contrast, mothers from wealthier families can buy breastmilk substitutes if they do not receive the proper knowledge and other breastfeeding-supporting conditions.
A review concluded that smoking was one of the strongest determinants of early breastfeeding practices in developed countries [
28]. Consistent with that finding, smoking was associated with EBF in the present analysis. Health promotion efforts need to raise awareness on the adverse effects of smoking, particularly during breastfeeding, as the nicotine concentration in breastmilk is 3 times higher than in the plasma in smoking women. Smoking also reduces breastmilk’s protective properties, volume, and duration of breastfeeding [
29].
Corresponding to the results in this study, cesarean delivery has been consistently seen as a barrier to EIBF [
12,
19,
25]. A plausible explanation for this association is the physical pain experienced by the mothers after delivering via cesarean section, which makes them feel uncomfortable in adapting to breastfeeding positions [
30]. It is also possible that mothers take time to recover from anesthesia, and their newborns could also be in respiratory distress, resulting in them being placed in a different room from their mother [
31]. In some hospitals in Indonesia, post-cesarean delivery procedures prevent infant-mother contact since both are taken to a separate room [
32]. Antibiotics administered to mothers after cesarean sections may also delay breastfeeding initiation as mothers do not want antibiotics to pass to their infants through breastmilk [
33].
Findings on the impact of cesarean delivery on EBF or CBF are inconsistent. Some previous studies reported that cesarean section was negatively associated with both practices [
33,
34]. In other studies, including this present analysis, the type of delivery was not among the determinants of EBF [
12]. Nevertheless, given that the number of mothers delivering via cesarean section is increasing, extra attention for this at-risk group should be of priority [
35]. For example, breastfeeding education and support could be delivered in the early postnatal period, and steps could be taken to promote immediate skin-to-skin contact [
36]. A systematic review on skin-to-skin contact concluded that this practice plays an essential role in successful breastfeeding until 4 months [
37]. In other words, the impact of skin-to-skin contact may not last throughout the entire period of EBF, similar to the present analysis of EBF, which found no significant association between skin-to-skin contact and EBF.
To date, findings on the association between postnatal visits and breastfeeding are inconclusive. In Bangladesh and India, postnatal visits encouraged EIBF [
12,
25], while in Afghanistan and Pakistan, they delayed breastfeeding initiation [
12]. An analysis of the Myanmar Demographic and Health Survey reported that mothers who received postnatal check-ups were less likely to practice EBF [
15]. In the present report, postnatal visits had no impact on either EIBF or EBF. Regarding EBF, the current finding is consistent with the evidence from South Asia [
12]. Our study also found that mothers receiving the first postnatal visit after 6 days were more likely to breastfeed their infants at 1 year and 2 years than those who never had postnatal visits. This finding can be explained by a previous analysis showing that breastfeeding counseling, as a part of postnatal care activities, improved mothers’ breastfeeding self-efficacy, which promoted optimal breastfeeding practices in Indonesia [
38]. In addition, postnatal visits may ensure that mothers receive ongoing support to overcome barriers during breastfeeding, especially for those undergoing cesarean delivery [
38]. However, a previous report found that postnatal visits did not impact CBF-1 [
12]. This inconsistency is probably due to the wide variety in postnatal care quality across regions.
In Indonesia, living with the extended family may influence breastfeeding practices since family members, particularly the husband, mother, mother-in-law, and grandmother, play critical roles in supporting mothers to breastfeed their infants [
38,
39]. However, family members from older generations (e.g., grandmothers) usually lack support for EBF, as they often advise mothers to give newborns or under 6-month infants substances other than breastmilk [
40]. At the same time, support in following the recommended breastfeeding practices could also come from family members [
39]. Therefore, prenatal and postnatal breastfeeding education targeting mothers and other family members is essential to improve family members’ awareness of the importance of optimal breastfeeding practices [
38].
A notable strength of this study is the use of nationally representative data with an internationally standardized methodology and a validated questionnaire, enabling generalizability to Indonesian females. The definitions of the variables included were based on international guidelines, making the results comparable across countries. Another strength is that it included CBF-1 and CBF-2 indicators, which are often overlooked, in addition to EBF and EIBF. As each indicator had differing determinants, analyzing all these indicators provides additional insights. Nonetheless, the survey design also comes with limitations. EIBF, as a variable generated from a recall-based interview, might introduce bias. Events that happened a long time in the past, such as ANC visits and skin-to-skin contact, were also at risk of memory bias. However, this can be assumed to only occur on a small scale because pregnancy and delivery are special events for mothers. In addition, the use of a large dataset would mitigate the risk of bias.
Improving breastfeeding practices is critical for preventing child malnutrition, morbidity, and mortality in LMICs. This study outlined a preliminary impression of the facilitators and barriers of optimal breastfeeding practices in Indonesia, which can bring meaningful insights for designing breastfeeding interventions. A general overview of the findings revealed no conflicting conclusions among the identified determinants in this study; no factor acted as a barrier for an outcome but became a facilitator for another one. This consistency is essential for policies and programs targeting multiple indicators of optimal breastfeeding practices to achieve maximum benefits.