Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

Brief Report

Reproductive Health Services for Adolescents With Hearing Impairment in Indonesia: Expectations and Reality: Ni Luh Putu Suariyani, Desak Putu Yuli Kurniati, Desak Nyoman Widyanthini, Luh Putu Wulandari Artha; J Prev Med Public Health. 2020;53(6):487-491. Published online October 20, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.20.033

3,599 View
163 Download

Abstract PDF: Objectives
Reproductive health education is essential for adolescents with hearing impairment. Since they communicate using specialized language (i.e., sign language), specialized reproductive health services in sign language is a necessity. This study aimed to describe the needs, availability, and expectations of reproductive health services among adolescents with hearing impairment. Methods: This study used a qualitative approach. It was carried out at a school for children with special needs in the city of Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Data were collected by in-depth interviews. The informants were 6 adolescents with hearing impairment aged 16-17 years and 4 other key informants, including school staff and health officers. The data were then analyzed using the thematic method. Results: We found that the informants had insufficient knowledge regarding reproductive health. There was no specific subject in the curriculum regarding this issue. Teachers did not specifically provide reproductive health information. The health service unit in the school had not been utilized well for this purpose. Furthermore, no reproductive health services were provided due to the limited number of healthcare workers who could use sign language. Conclusions: The awareness and intentions of adolescents with hearing impairment regarding access to reproductive health services remain low. Health service units at schools should be optimized to enable schools to provide reproductive health information and services for these adolescents.; Summary

Original Article

Assessing the Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction after Receiving Laser in situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) .: Woohyun Cho, Hye Young Kang, Ji Yoon Kim, Yoon Chung, Jongho Lee, Jemyung Lee; J Prev Med Public Health. 2004;37(2):111-119.

2,016 View
46 Download

Abstract PDF: PURPOSE
To identify those factors influencing the post-operative satisfaction in myopia patients receiving laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) METHODS: This study included 288 consecutive patients who received LASIK between July and December 2001 from two eye clinics located in Seoul and Pusan. Factors that were considered to influence post-operative satisfaction included pre-operative baseline characteristics, pre-operative expectation for treatment outcomes, and treatment outcomes. Before undergoing LASIK, study subjects were asked to rate the degree of their expectation for the improvement of visual functions and symptoms after LASIK on a 5-point Likert-type scale: where 1 referred to 'somewhat worse, ' 2 to 'no change, ' 3 to 'somewhat improved, ' 4 to 'improved, ' and 5 to 'very improved.' Self-administered questionnaire was used to evaluate baseline visual functions and symptoms on a 5-point scale before LASIK. At 6 months after LASIK, the evaluation was repeated to measure treatment outcomes in terms of the difference in the score before and after LASIK. Post-operative satisfaction was also measured at 6 months on a 5-point scale. Multiple regression analysis was performed to examine the independent relationship between influencing factors and postoperative satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 171 patients (59.4%) participated in the 6-month follow-up investigation. The average expectation scores for the improvement in visual functions and symptoms were 3.8 and 3.4, respectively. The average score for the 7 questions assessing satisfaction was 4.0. The results of the regression analysis showed that the post-operative satisfaction increased with improvement in the visual function (beta=0.16, p< 0.05) and symptoms (beta=0.25, p< 0.05), the degree of preoperative refractive error (beta=0.26-0.67, p< 0.05) and in male patients (beta=0.31, p< 0.1). The pre-operative expectation was not a statistically significant factor in explaining postoperative satisfaction in the regression model. CONCLUSION: The finding from this study was that patients with very severe myopia tended to be more satisfied with the treatment than those with mild myopia, which implies that LASIK can be more beneficial to those suffering from a severe visual condition. Patient satisfaction was also significantly affected by the treatment outcomes experienced after LASIK. This suggests that improving the clinical outcome is the most fundamental requirement for the improvement of patient satisfaction.; Summary

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search