Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

JPMPH : Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Korean J Prev Med > Accepted Articles > Article
Original Article Validation of the Disaster Adaptation and Resilience Scale for Vulnerable Communities in Vietnam’s Coastal Regions
Thanh Gia Nguyen1orcid , Binh Thang Tran1orcid , Minh Tu Nguyen2orcid , Dinh Duong Le1corresp_iconorcid

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.24.110 [Accepted]
Published online: April 25, 2024
  • 894 Views
  • 9 Download
  • 0 Crossref
  • 0 Scopus
1Faculty of Public Health, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Vietnam, Hue, Viet Nam
2Office for Undergraduate Training, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue, Viet Nam
Corresponding author:  Dinh Duong Le,
Email: ledinhduong@hueuniv.edu.vn
Received: 28 February 2024   • Revised: 3 April 2024   • Accepted: 12 April 2024

Objectives
This study validated the Vietnamese version of the Disaster Adaptation and Resilience Scale (DARS) for use in vulnerable communities in Vietnam.
Methods
This was a cross-sectional study involving 595 adults from 2 identified communities. The original DARS assessment tool was translated, and the validity and reliability of the Vietnamese version of DARS (V-DARS) were assessed. The internal consistency of the overall scale and its subscales was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega reliability coefficients. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was employed to evaluate its construct validity, building upon the factor structure identified in exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Construct validity was assessed based on convergent and discriminant validity.
Results
Following the established criteria for EFA, 8 items were removed, resulting in a refined V-DARS structure comprising 35 items distributed across 5 distinct factors. Both alpha and omega reliability coefficients indicated strong internal consistency for the overall scale (α = .963, ω = .963) and for each of the 5 sub-scales (all > 0.80). The CFA model also retained the 5-factor structure with 35 items. The model fit indices showed acceptable values (RMSEA: 0.072; CFI: 0.912; TLI: 0.904; chi-square test: <0.01). Additionally, the convergent and discriminant validity of the V-DARS were deemed appropriate and satisfactory for explaining the measurement structure.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that the V-DARS is a valid and reliable scale for use within vulnerable communities in Vietnam to assess adaptive responses to natural disasters. It may also be considered for use in other populations.

Related articles

JPMPH : Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health