Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

JPMPH : Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health



Page Path
HOME > J Prev Med Public Health > Volume 46(5); 2013 > Article
Original Article
Serum 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin Levels and Their Association With Age, Body Mass Index, Smoking, Military Record-based Variables, and Estimated Exposure to Agent Orange in Korean Vietnam Veterans
Sang-Wook Yi1, Heechoul Ohrr2, Jong-Uk Won2, Jae-Seok Song1, Jae-Seok Hong3
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health 2013;46(5):226-236.
Published online: September 30, 2013
  • 86 Download
  • 12 Crossref
  • 14 Scopus

1Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Kwandong University College of Medicine, Gangneung, Korea.

2Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

3Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, Seoul, Korea.

Corresponding author: Jae-Seok Hong, PhD. 22 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 137-927, Korea. Tel: +82-2-2182-2559, Fax: +82-2-6710-5842,
• Received: June 10, 2013   • Accepted: August 5, 2013

Copyright © 2013 The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • Objectives
    The aim of this study was to examine the levels of serum 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and evaluate their association with age, body mass index, smoking, military record-based variables, and estimated exposure to Agent Orange in Korean Vietnam veterans.
  • Methods
    Serum levels of TCDD were analyzed in 102 Vietnam veterans. Information on age, body mass index, and smoking status were obtained from a self-reported questionnaire. The perceived exposure was assessed by a 6-item questionnaire. Two proximity-based exposures were constructed by division/brigade level and battalion/company level unit information using the Stellman exposure opportunity index model.
  • Results
    The mean and median of serum TCDD levels was 1.2 parts per trillion (ppt) and 0.9 ppt, respectively. Only 2 Vietnam veterans had elevated levels of TCDD (>10 ppt). The levels of TCDD did not tend to increase with the likelihood of exposure to Agent Orange, as estimated from either proximity-based exposure or perceived self-reported exposure. The serum TCDD levels were not significantly different according to military unit, year of first deployment, duration of deployment, military rank, age, body mass index, and smoking status.
  • Conclusions
    The average serum TCDD levels in the Korean Vietnam veterans were lower than those reported for other occupationally or environmentally exposed groups and US Vietnam veterans, and their use as an objective marker of Agent Orange exposure may have some limitations. The unit of deployment, duration of deployment, year of first deployment, military rank, perceived self-reported exposure, and proximity-based exposure to Agent Orange were not associated with TCDD levels in Korean Vietnam veterans. Age, body mass index and smoking also were not associated with TCDD levels.
In the Vietnam War, from 1961 to 1971, the US military sprayed about 76 million liters of tactical herbicides (hereafter, "Agent Orange"). During the manufacturing process of 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid, a major ingredient of Agent Orange, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) was included as an impurity [1]. About 320 000 Korean Vietnam veterans were estimated to be exposed to the Agent Orange that included TCDD [2]. Since the 1980s, research has been performed on the TCDD concentrations in human samples of US veterans [3,4]. In the meantime, the research on TCDD concentrations among Korean veterans has not been substantial [5], and no research that deals with individual serum TCDD concentrations has yet been presented on the scientific journal. It has been reported that the serum TCDD concentration of Korean veterans was lower than that of an occupational cohort or US veterans [3,5-8]. Past studies have used pooled samples, not individual samples, and thus had some limitations, including that about 40% of the analyzed TCDD concentration was below the detection limit [5].
Although there has been substantial interest in the health effects of veterans' exposure to Agent Orange, it is a challenging task to develop a new exposure index that is valid and reliable [1]. Individuals with high exposure to TCDD still have high TCDD concentrations even years after the exposure [4,6]. Past studies on veterans and occupational cohorts who were exposed to a high level of TCDD-contaminated chemicals have reported a relationship between the TCDD concentration in human tissue samples and TCDD exposure-related records [6,8]. An occupational cohort study reported a relationship between the duration of exposure to processes involving TCDD contamination and TCDD concentrations in the human body [6]. A study on US veterans presented the impacts of military positions and ranks of the veterans on serum TCDD concentrations [8]. Thus, the researchers investigated whether TCDD concentrations among veterans' specimens could be a reliable tool for measuring the exposure to Agent Orange and whether they could have associations with the newly developed exposure index of Agent Orange in US veterans [3]. Korean researchers investigated the correlation between categorized exposure to Agent Orange and serum TCDD concentration as a reference [5]. They, however, did not examine the links between TCDD levels and veterans' military records including military ranks. Meanwhile, the TCDD concentration in the human tissue was reported to have relationships with age [9-11], gender [11-13], body mass index (BMI) [10,11], and smoking [14,15]. There have been limited reports about the influences of these variables on TCDD concentration among Koreans [16].
Thus, this study first analyzed TCDD concentrations among Korean Vietnam veterans and investigated whether TCDD concentrations can be used as an objective tool to measure exposure to Agent Orange. In addition, we investigated how the serum TCDD concentration is related to the Agent Orange exposure index that was developed from self-reported health information and military variables. This would help us validate a newly developed exposure index [3,5] and evaluate whether serum TCDD concentrations could be utilized as an effective tool to measure the exposure of Korean Vietnam veterans to Agent Orange. Third, we investigated how serum TCDD concentrations were associated with age, BMI, and smoking.
Study Subjects and TCDD Measurement
Ohrr et al. [17] conducted health examinations and a survey among 2012 Korean Vietnam veterans at 11 participating hospitals in 2001. At two hospitals, researchers took blood samples in blood bags without anticoagulant from a convenience sample of 105 Vietnam veterans who provided written consent and kept the serum frozen at -72℃ [2]. In 2007, the serum TCDD was analyzed by the research team of the School of Environmental Science and Engineering at Pohang University of Science and Technology in Korea. The serum was analyzed for 102 of the veterans, that is, all but 3 veterans from whom specimens were lacking.
The measurement of dioxin was implemented by high resolution gas chromatography / high resolution mass spectrometry. About 50 mL of serum was analyzed and the limit of detection (LOD) was 1 parts per quadrillion per gram serum or about 0.3 to 0.4 parts per trillion (ppt) per gram lipid. The two samples with less than the LOD were considered to have concentrations as the half of LOD. More details about dioxin measurements, equipment, and quality control can be found in other documents from the same analytic team [18].
Measures of Potential TCDD-related Factors
During the health examination in 2001, researchers collected the subjects' smoking, weight, and height information from a self-reported survey [17]. Their BMI was calculated as a subject's weight in kilograms divided by the square of the subject's height in meters. Smoking status (current smoker, past smoker, and never smoker) and pack-years, which was calculated using the amount of smoking (number of cigarettes) and duration of smoking, were obtained. The pack-year analysis was only available for current smokers since only a limited amount of smoking information was collected for past smokers.
Information on the veterans' unit at the division / brigade level, duration of deployment, and military ranks were obtained from the Ministry of Defense [2]. The duration of deployment was calculated by day and then divided into tertiles. Information about the veterans' unit at the battalion / company level was collected from a postal survey in 2004 [2].
Agent Orange Exposure Index

Perceived exposure index to Agent Orange

The perceived exposure index to Agent Orange, composed of six items, was adopted from previous research [19]. Respondents were grouped into one of 4 categories- no, low, moderate, and high exposure-according to their answers to the six questions [19]. A respondent who had sprayed Agent Orange (question 1) or handled spray equipment (question 2) was put in the "high" category. A respondent who was present during the spraying (question 3) or had the Agent Orange on their skin or clothing (question 4) was assigned to the "moderate" category. A veteran who had walked through a defoliated area (question 5) or had been exposed in ways not described in questions 1 to 4 (question 6) was placed in the "low" group. Those responding "no" to all of the above 6 questions were treated as a "no" exposure group. Then, the "no" category and "low" category were combined and designated the "low" group while the "moderate" category and "high" category were collapsed into the "high" group, thus resulting in 2 groups in the end.

Proximity-based exposure index to Agent Orange

This exposure opportunity model was based on the proximity of the military unit to the sprayed area. The exposure opportunity index model E4, developed by Stellman et al. [20], was applied. Researchers identified the Korean military unit's post location (for the battalion level and higher), tactical area of responsibility, and operational area. The records obtained from the Ministry of Defense contained information of deployed unit in Vietnam veterans on 3 combat units (the Capital division, Ninth division, and the Marine second brigade, as far as the division / brigade level only) and 4 support units. The self-reported survey revealed information on the battalion level and company level (for artillery and some units). This study constructed the division / brigade level exposure index from military records and the battalion / company level exposure index from the self-reported survey.
The E4 scores were calculated for geographic locations and calendar dates [20], and those results were combined with the location histories of the military units to calculate unit level E4 scores [21]. Veterans with the same military unit and service period would have the same exposure score. After adding 1 to each E4 score, the common log-transformed E4 score (Le4) was used as the individual's Agent Orange exposure index. The division / brigade level exposure index had 102 veterans and the battalion and company level exposure index had 75 veterans who participated in the 2004 survey. The veterans were categorized into 2 groups (low [Le4<4.0] and high exposure [Le4≥4]) and 4 groups (no [Le4<0.1], low [0.1≤Le4<4.0], moderate [4.0≤Le4<5.0], and high exposure [Le4≥5.0]). The details about the exposure index and group classification can be found elsewhere [2].
Statistical Analysis
As the TCDD concentration is frequently considered to follow a log-normal distribution [13], the common log-transformed TCDD (Log10TCDD) was used as a basis for analysis. The TCDD concentration was analyzed in the forms of the geometric mean, geometric standard deviation, arithmetic mean, minimum value, 25th percentile, median, 75th percentile, and maximum value.
The Log10TCDD concentration and non-transformed TCDD concentration did not follow a normal distribution (Shapiro-Wilk test p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively). An ANOVA test was used to demonstrate differences in the TCDD levels between the health variables (including age, smoking, BMI, and obesity) and the military variables (including deployed unit, first year of deployment, duration of deployment, military ranks, and exposure index) that were potentially related to the TCDD levels. A multiple regression analysis was done to demonstrate the impacts of these variables on the TCDD concentrations while controlling other variables. A correlation analysis was implemented to investigate the relationships between TCDD-related variables and TCDD concentrations. The p-value was calculated with two-sided tests and a statistical significance level of 0.05 was applied. All statistical analysis was performed using SAS version 9.2 (SAS Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
The average age and BMI of veterans in 2001 were 56.5±3.7 and 24.2±2.8, respectively. 41 veterans (40.2%) were current smokers and 78 veterans (76.5%) were part of combat units. 38 veterans (37.3%) had been deployed more recently than 1970 while 66 veterans (64.7%) had an enlisted rank (Table 1). The average duration of deployment in Vietnam was 394.8±117 days and the median duration was 382.5 days. For the division / brigade level exposure index, the high exposure group (of 2 groups) had 51 veterans (50.0%). For the battalion / company level exposure index, the high exposure group (of 2 groups) had 28 veterans (37.3%). For the perceived self-reported exposure index, the high exposure group (of 2 groups) had 46 veterans (45.1%) (Table 1).
The range of serum TCDD concentrations of entire sample of veterans was 0.2 to 11.4 ppt. In ANOVA analysis, when the TCDD concentrations were compared by veteran characteristics, there were not significant differences in TCDD concentrations among the groups from the perspectives of selected variables that included age, BMI, military variables, and the exposure index of the Agent Orange (Table 1).
Although correlation analysis found that the exposure index of the battalion / company level had a relatively high correlation coefficient, there were not statistically significant relationships between TCDD concentrations and the variables of age, BMI, and the proximity-based exposure index as continuous variables (Table 2).
No multiple regression model was significant in explaining the serum TCDD concentrations. In the 4 group analysis of the exposure index of Agent Orange, when controlling for age, BMI, smoking, and military variables, the low exposure group of the battalion / company level exposure, compared to the no exposure group, had significantly high TCDD concentrations and the high perceived exposure group had significantly high TCDD concentrations compared to the no perceived exposure group. In the multiple regression analysis, the results by age, smoking, and other potentially related variables are presented from a model that included the battalion / company level exposure index due to the highest R-squared value (Table 3). Similar to the results of ANOVA, there were not statistically significant differences between TCDD concentrations and age, smoking, BMI, and other variables.
In the distribution of TCDD concentrations, the largest number of veterans (n=25) were with the range of 0.8-0.9 ppt, and the concentrations overall had a right skewed distribution (Figure 1). There were 2 veterans who had concentrations higher than 10 ppt and 2 veterans below the LOD.
The study found the mean value of the veterans' TCDD concentration was 1.2 ppt and median value was 0.9 ppt. Specifically, these values were higher than what Kim et al. reported in 2003 (mean 0.7 ppt) [5] but lower than Zone A residents of Seveso (median 447 ppt), workers at a TCDD-contaminated plant in the US (mean 233 ppt) [7], Ranch Hand veterans (median 12.4 ppt) [8], sprayers in US Army Chemical Corps (mean 4.3 ppt) [22], and Vietnam veterans from a Centers for Disease Control (CDC) study (mean 4.2 ppt) [3] (Table 4).
This study analyzed the serum TCDD concentrations among Vietnam veterans and investigated the relationships between TCDD concentrations and the Agent Orange exposure indices, and other potentially related variables. The serum TCDD concentrations among Korean Vietnam veterans were lower than those reported in other studies, and the serum TCDD concentrations did not have relationships with the military record-based variables, Agent Orange exposure indices, age, BMI, or smoking.
The study's serum TCDD concentration among Korean veterans was higher than that of other reports on Korean Vietnam veterans [5] and lower than that of US Vietnam veterans. Specifically, this study found that the serum TCDD concentration among Korean veterans was lower than that of the Seveso residents in Italy, workers of the TCDD-contaminated factory, and veterans of US Ranch Hand and the US Army Chemical Unit, who directly sprayed Agent Orange [8,22]. This suggests that Korean veterans were not as highly exposed to Agent Orange or TCDD as the US Ranch Hand veterans and Seveso residents.
The Korean veterans had lower TCDD concentrations than their US counterparts who did not spray Agent Orange [3]. There may be some explanations. While the CDC study in the US collected the blood samples during 1986 and 1987, the current project accumulated them in 2001. There is a gap of about 14 to 15 years between the blood collection periods, which allows for the span of two half-lives of TCDD in the human body [1]. If the concentration in the US veterans was 4 ppt in 1986 and the concentration was about the same as that of Korean veterans, then after two half-lives it would be 1 ppt. Second, the average American's background exposure level might be higher than that of Koreans. It is presumed that the US population's exposure to TCDD was highest in the late 1960s and early 1970s [9,10,23]. Ever since, the average American's TCDD concentration is considered to have been decreasing [4,6,23,24]. The TCDD concentration level among US veterans who were not part of the Agent Orange spraying units was not higher than that of the general US population [3,22,23]. In the 1960s in Korea, since it cost less to cut grass by hand than use herbicides [25], spraying herbicides such as 2,4,5-T [26], was not popular. The TCDD concentrations among Korean residents near municipal waste incinerators and workers were less than 0.3 ppt on average [16,18,27,28]. A study on the Shihwa industrial area in Korea reported that the serum TCDD concentration for workers was 2.0 ppt on average, while the nearby residents had an average concentration of 0.1 ppt [29]. Another study found that the concentration level of a pooled sample of non-Vietnam veteran controls in Korea was below the LOD [5]. In other words, the concentration of the US veterans was higher than that of the Korean veterans due to the fact that background TCDD level of the US population was likely to be higher than that of the Koreans, not because US military had more exposure to Agent Orange than its Korean counterparts. At the same time, we cannot rule out that Korean veterans may have had less exposure to Agent Orange than US veterans. For instance, the Ranch Hand study found that enlisted soldiers had higher TCDD concentrations than officers [8]. The present study had 35% officers and noncommissioned officers, while the US study investigated only the enlisted. Furthermore, US research only incorporated military units where there had been extensive spraying of Agent Orange [3], thus focusing on those likely to have had the greatest exposure.
The study results imply that the serum TCDD level of Korean veterans might not be an objective index to use in investigating exposure to Agent Orange; only 2 veterans (2.0%) had higher than 10 ppt. One answered that he had never been exposed to Agent Orange. The concentration in the Korean veterans was not higher than that in the general US population [13,23]. Although there is a possibility that the level of the Korean veterans is higher than that of the general Korean population [5,18,27-29], we have to consider that the LOD for TCDD is more precise in this study. Above all, compared to the past literature, the TCDD concentration of the 1 ppt for each veteran is hard to be interpreted as a high level of exposure [30]. Further, we have to consider the lapse of time since the war, the half-life differences among people [31,32], and the environmental exposure to incinerators, food, etc. Unless we focus on the high exposure groups, such as US Ranch Hand veterans, in which a larger concentration of TCDD still remains, the current TCDD levels of veterans such as the Koreans in this study could be an indicator of recent TCDD exposure rather than Vietnam War exposure, given that the war occurred several decades ago.
In multiple regression analysis, no model, including duration of deployment, unit of deployment, military ranks, perceived exposure index, or proximity-based exposure index, could significantly explain the TCDD levels among Korean Vietnam veterans. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) cohort study [6], Seveso population [33], and Ranch Hand veterans [8] showed meaningful differences in TCDD concentration levels according to their work duration at the contaminated factory, residential area, military ranking, and duties performed. In the meantime, a study on US veterans excluding the spraying units reported that neither military records nor self-reported information had significant relationships with serum TCDD concentrations [3]. This study's results suggest that it is a difficult undertaking to find individuals among non-spraying Korean veterans who were very highly exposed to Agent Orange-as in the case with Ranch Hand veterans, the NIOSH cohort, and Seveso residents-by using an Agent Orange exposure index based on self-reported information and military records.
Past TCDD-related investigations in the US have reported strong relationships between high TCDD concentrations and old age and high BMI [9-13]. On the other hand, the current research in Korea found that age, BMI, and smoking did not make a difference in the concentration level. Studies in other countries found that the relationship between age and TCDD concentration was not linear [34] and younger age was related to higher TCDD concentration [35]. When focusing on Koreans in their 50s and above, the association between age and TCDD concentrations was not clear-cut [16,28,36]. Similarly, the research on those in the US, when the subjects were restricted to males in their 50s in the general population, did not show a clear association between age and TCDD [11,13]. In the current study, the age range of the Korean veterans was narrow since most of them were in their 50s, so age may not have impacted the concentration level. Other studies of Koreans found BMI did not have an influence on TCDD concentrations [16,36]. While US studies included participants with a BMI higher than 40 [10], in our study, the highest BMI was below 30. There is still room for debate concerning TCDD concentrations among smokers. While some studies have reported that smokers had higher TCDD concentrations [14,15], others found that smokers had lower TCDD concentrations [11,37]. Additional research is needed to gather conclusive evidence on whether the TCDD concentration among Koreans has strong associations with age, BMI, or smoking status.
One of the limitations of this study was the utilization of a convenience sampling method when we recruited the veterans for blood samples. There were no differences in self-reported health status in general (p=0.18), self-reported health status compared to the same age group (p=0.24), veterans' age (p=0.55), and BMI (p=0.47) among the 105 veterans who agreed to the blood and other veterans. When we contacted possible recruits for the study, the proximity-based exposure index was not being developed and the perceived exposure index was completed after the medical examination. Even though the researchers adopted a convenience sampling method, the veterans who gave blood samples were selected neither by the exposure index nor health status. We, unfortunately, could not obtain blood samples from a non-Vietnam veteran control group. We should note, however, that the same analytic team has examined TCDD levels in the Korean general population in the past [16,18,27-29,36]. It is not feasible to make direct comparisons with them due to the difference in the LOD. We missed the opportunity to assess the links between age and BMI and TCDD among the veterans and a control group. In the meantime, the main focus for serum TCDD research in Koreans has been the workers at the contamination sources, including incinerators, and neighboring residents [16,18,29,36], along with a few studies on the general population and residents who do not live nearby a contamination source [27,28]. As food is the main source of exposure in human accumulation of polychlorinated dibenzo-dioxins / -furans, the way food is consumed can make a difference in the human TCDD concentration level [34,38]. Thus, the lack of inclusion of food intake was another challenge we must consider in the future.
In conclusion, as of 2001, Korean veterans' serum TCDD concentration was lower than that of other environmental, occupational, and US veterans' studies and may be similar to that of the general Korean population. Considering that the Vietnam War was over 40 years ago and the Korean veterans have since been exposed to other environments, it would not be straightforward to assess their exposure to Agent Orange by using the serum TCDD concentration unless we could identify some Korean veterans who were very highly exposed to Agent Orange as much as the US Ranch Hand veterans were. This study found that there were no significant relationships between serum TCDD concentration and deployment duration, unit of deployment, year of first deployment, military ranks, and the perceived exposure index and two proximity-based exposure indices to Agent Orange developed by the current research team. As the serum TCDD concentration itself seems to have some limitations as a solid measurement of the exposure to Agent Orange, constructing a more accurate indicator of exposure to Agent Orange, based on military records or self-reported information, in order to clearly identify the high exposure group among Korean veterans would be a challenge. The study also discovered that there were no significant relationships between serum TCDD concentration, and age, BMI, and smoking in Korean Vietnam veterans.
This study was supported by a research grant of the Korean Ministry of Patriots and Veterans Affairs, 1999, 2003, and 2007. The authors truly thank Dr. JM Stellman and Dr. SD Stellman for their permission to use their herbicide exposure data. We also sincerely thank YS Chang and his research team at the School of Environmental Science and Engineering at Pohang University of Science and Technology for their TCDD measurements.

The authors have no conflicts of interest with the material presented in this paper.

  • 1. Institute of Medicine. Veterans and Agent Orange: update 2010. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2011. p. 54-71 p. 89-92.
  • 2. Ohrr H, Yi SW, Hong JS, Yi JJ, Kang HJ, Won JU, et al. The 3rd epidemiologic study on the adverse health effects of Agent Orange among Vietnam veterans. Seoul: Yonsei University Health System; 2006. p. 27-44 p. 51-54 (Korean).
  • 3. Serum 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin levels in US Army Vietnam-era veterans. The Centers for Disease Control Veterans Health Studies. JAMA 1988;260(9):1249-1254. 2841506.ArticlePubMed
  • 4. Kahn PC, Gochfeld M, Nygren M, Hansson M, Rappe C, Velez H, et al. Dioxins and dibenzofurans in blood and adipose tissue of Agent Orange-exposed Vietnam veterans and matched controls. JAMA 1988;259(11):1661-1667. 3343772.ArticlePubMed
  • 5. Kim JS, Kang HK, Lim HS, Cheong HK, Lim MK. A Study on the correlation between categorization of the individual exposure levels to Agent Orange and serum dioxin levels among the Korean Vietnam veterans. Korean J Prev Med 2001;34(1):80-88. (Korean).
  • 6. Fingerhut MA, Halperin WE, Marlow DA, Piacitelli LA, Honchar PA, Sweeney MH, et al. Cancer mortality in workers exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. N Engl J Med 1991;324(4):212-218. 1985242.ArticlePubMed
  • 7. Michalek JE, Tripathi RC. Pharmacokinetics of TCDD in veterans of Operation Ranch Hand: 15-year follow-up. J Toxicol Environ Health A 1999;57(6):369-378. 10478820.ArticlePubMed
  • 8. Wolfe WH, Michalek JE, Miner JC, Rahe A, Silva J, Thomas WF, et al. Health status of Air Force veterans occupationally exposed to herbicides in Vietnam. I. Physical health. JAMA 1990;264(14):1824-1831. 2402041.ArticlePubMed
  • 9. Pinsky PF, Lorber MN. A model to evaluate past exposure to 2,3,7,8-TCDD. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 1998;8(2):187-206. 9577750.PubMed
  • 10. Collins JJ, Bodner K, Burns CJ, Budinsky RA, Lamparski LL, Wilken M, et al. Body mass index and serum chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin and dibenzofuran levels. Chemosphere 2007;66(6):1079-1085. 16919309.ArticlePubMed
  • 11. Garabrant DH, Franzblau A, Lepkowski J, Gillespie BW, Adriaens P, Demond A, et al. The University of Michigan Dioxin Exposure Study: predictors of human serum dioxin concentrations in Midland and Saginaw, Michigan. Environ Health Perspect 2009;117(5):818-824. 19479027.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 12. Patterson DG Jr, Turner WE, Caudill SP, Needham LL. Total TEQ reference range (PCDDs, PCDFs, cPCBs, mono-PCBs) for the US population 2001-2002. Chemosphere 2008;73(1 Suppl):S261-S277. 18511103.ArticlePubMed
  • 13. Chen Q, Garabrant DH, Hedgeman E, Little RJ, Elliott MR, Gillespie B, et al. Estimation of background serum 2,3,7,8-TCDD concentrations by using quantile regression in the UMDES and NHANES populations. Epidemiology 2010;21(Suppl 4):S51-S57. 20220524.ArticlePubMed
  • 14. Fierens S, Eppe G, De Pauw E, Bernard A. Gender dependent accumulation of dioxins in smokers. Occup Environ Med 2005;62(1):61-62. 15613611.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 15. Muto H, Takizawa Y. Dioxins in cigarette smoke. Arch Environ Health 1989;44(3):171-174. 2751353.ArticlePubMed
  • 16. Kim BH, Ikonomou MG, Lee SJ, Kim HS, Chang YS. Concentrations of polybrominated diphenyl ethers, polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans, and polychlorinated biphenyls in human blood samples from Korea. Sci Total Environ 2005;336(1-3):45-56. 15589248.ArticlePubMed
  • 17. Ohrr H, Yi SW, Won JU, Park WS, Hong JS, Sull JW, et al. The 2nd epidemiologic study on the adverse health effects of Agent Orange among Vietnam veterans. Seoul: Yonsei University Health System; 2001. p. 13-21 (Korean).
  • 18. Moon CS, Chang YS, Kim BH, Shin D, Ikeda M. Evaluation of serum dioxin congeners among residents near continuously burning municipal solid waste incinerators in Korea. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2005;78(3):205-210. 15744508.ArticlePubMed
  • 19. Decouflé P, Holmgreen P, Boyle CA, Stroup NE. Self-reported health status of Vietnam veterans in relation to perceived exposure to herbicides and combat. Am J Epidemiol 1992;135(3):312-323. 1546707.ArticlePubMed
  • 20. Stellman JM, Stellman SD, Weber T, Tomasallo C, Stellman AB, Christian R Jr. A geographic information system for characterizing exposure to Agent Orange and other herbicides in Vietnam. Environ Health Perspect 2003;111(3):321-328. 12611661.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 21. Institute of Medicine. The utility of proximity-based herbicide exposure assessment in epidemiologic studies of Vietnam veterans. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2008. p. 35-61.
  • 22. Kang HK, Dalager NA, Needham LL, Patterson DG Jr, Lees PS, Yates K, et al. Health status of Army Chemical Corps Vietnam veterans who sprayed defoliant in Vietnam. Am J Ind Med 2006;49(11):875-884. 17006952.ArticlePubMed
  • 23. Aylward LL, Hays SM. Temporal trends in human TCDD body burden: decreases over three decades and implications for exposure levels. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 2002;12(5):319-328. 12198580.ArticlePubMed
  • 24. Schecter A, Päpke O, Tung KC, Joseph J, Harris TR, Dahlgren J. Polybrominated diphenyl ether flame retardants in the U.S. population: current levels, temporal trends, and comparison with dioxins, dibenzofurans, and polychlorinated biphenyls. J Occup Environ Med 2005;47(3):199-211. 15761315.ArticlePubMed
  • 25. Buckner JE. Final report: vegetation control plan CY68. San Francisco: United States Army Advisory Group; 1969. p. E-1.
  • 26. Yi SW, Ohrr H, Lim HS. Agent Orange-related chemical exposure: health effects and compensation policy in Korea. J Environ Health Sci 2013;39(3):197-210. (Korean).Article
  • 27. Leem JH, Hong YC, Lee KH, Kwon HJ, Jang JY. Exposure assessment of PCDD/Fs and monitoring of health effects on workers and residents near the waste incinerators in Korea. Korean J Prev Med 2003;36(4):314-322. (Korean).
  • 28. Yang JY, Lim YG, Chang YS, Kim CS, Shin DC. Serum PCDDs/PCDFs levels for the residents living in the vicinity and workers of the municipal waste incinerators in Seoul, Korea. J Environ Toxicol 2006;21(4):337-347. (Korean).
  • 29. Yang YH, Kim BH, Chang YS. Analysis of PCDD/Fs and PCBs in human blood and characteristics of contamination sources. Anal Sci Technol 2001;14(2):147-158. (Korean).
  • 30. Sorg O, Zennegg M, Schmid P, Fedosyuk R, Valikhnovskyi R, Gaide O, et al. 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) poisoning in Victor Yushchenko: identification and measurement of TCDD metabolites. Lancet 2009;374(9696):1179-1185. 19660807.ArticlePubMed
  • 31. Kerger BD, Leung HW, Scott P, Paustenbach DJ, Needham LL, Patterson DG Jr, et al. Age- and concentration-dependent elimination half-life of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in Seveso children. Environ Health Perspect 2006;114(10):1596-1602. 17035149.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 32. Milbrath MO, Wenger Y, Chang CW, Emond C, Garabrant D, Gillespie BW, et al. Apparent half-lives of dioxins, furans, and polychlorinated biphenyls as a function of age, body fat, smoking status, and breast-feeding. Environ Health Perspect 2009;117(3):417-425. 19337517.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 33. Needham LL, Gerthoux PM, Patterson DG Jr, Brambilla P, Turner WE, Beretta C, et al. Serum dioxin levels in Seveso, Italy, population in 1976. Teratog Carcinog Mutagen 1997-1998;17(4-5):225-240. 9508732.Article
  • 34. Hsu JF, Chang YC, Liao PC. Age-dependent congener profiles of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans in the general population of Taiwan. Chemosphere 2010;81(4):469-477. 20797765.ArticlePubMed
  • 35. Eskenazi B, Mocarelli P, Warner M, Needham L, Patterson DG Jr, Samuels S, et al. Relationship of serum TCDD concentrations and age at exposure of female residents of Seveso, Italy. Environ Health Perspect 2004;112(1):22-27. 14698926.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 36. Kim YS. A study on the association between life factor and dioxin in blood [dissertation]. Seoul: Yonsei University; 2004. (Korean).
  • 37. Ferriby LL, Knutsen JS, Harris M, Unice KM, Scott P, Nony P, et al. Evaluation of PCDD/F and dioxin-like PCB serum concentration data from the 2001-2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey of the United States population. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2007;17(4):358-371. 16823400.ArticlePubMed
  • 38. Goldman LR, Harnly M, Flattery J, Patterson DG Jr, Needham LL. Serum polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans among people eating contaminated home-produced eggs and beef. Environ Health Perspect 2000;108(1):13-19. 10620519.ArticlePubMedPMC
Figure 1
Distribution of serum 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) concentrations in Korean Vietnam veterans as of June, 2001 (n=102). Two cases below the detection limit assigned to be 0.
Table 1.
Number of cases and serum TCDD concentrations by characteristics in subjects (n=102)
Characteristics Classification n (%) Serum TCDD concentration (pg/g lipid)
Mean GM GSD p-value1 Minimum 25th percentile Median 75th percentile Maximum
Age (y) as of June 1, 2001 <54 25 (24.5) 1.4 1.0 (2.0) 0.88 0.3 0.7 1.0 1.2 11.1
54-56 42 (41.2) 1.3 1.0 (1.9) 0.3 0.7 0.9 1.2 11.4
≥57 35 (34.3) 1.0 0.9 (1.6) 0.2 0.8 0.9 1.1 4.0
Body mass index (kg/m2) <21 16 (15.7) 0.9 0.8 (1.4) 0.63 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.8
21-24.9 40 (39.2) 1.3 1.0 (1.9) 0.2 0.8 1.0 1.2 11.1
25-26.9 26 (25.5) 1.5 1.0 (2.1) 0.3 0.7 1.0 1.3 11.4
≥27 20 (19.6) 1.0 0.9 (1.6) 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.2 2.7
Smoking Current 41 (40.2) 1.3 1.0 (1.7) 0.72 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.1 11.1
Never 41 (40.2) 1.3 0.9 (2.1) 0.2 0.7 0.9 1.2 11.4
Past 20 (19.6) 1.0 0.9 (1.5) 0.5 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.8
Military unit Combat 78 (76.5) 1.2 1.0 (1.8) 0.78 0.2 0.7 1.0 1.2 11.1
Support 24 (23.5) 1.4 0.9 (2.0) 0.3 0.6 0.8 1.3 11.4
First year of deployment 1964-1967 34 (33.3) 1.0 0.9 (1.6) 0.40 0.2 0.7 0.9 1.1 4.0
1968-1969 30 (29.4) 1.3 1.0 (1.9) 0.3 0.7 0.9 1.2 11.4
1970-1973 38 (37.3) 1.4 1.1 (1.9) 0.3 0.7 1.0 1.3 11.1
Duration of deployment in Vietnam (d) ≤358 34 (33.3) 1.6 1.0 (2.1) 0.70 0.3 0.7 0.9 1.2 11.4
359-401 34 (33.3) 1.1 1.0 (1.7) 0.4 0.7 0.9 1.2 3.9
>401  34 (33.3)  1.0  0.9  (1.6)  0.2  0.7  0.9 1.1 4.0
Military rank Enlisted rank  66 (64.7)  1.3  1.0  (1.8)  0.84  0.3  0.7  0.9 1.2 11.4
Noncommissioned officer  16 (15.7)  1.1  0.9  (2.0)  0.2  0.8  1.0 1.1 2.7
Officer  20 (19.6)  1.2  1.0  (1.7)  0.6  0.8  0.9 1.2 4.0
Division/brigade levelexposure (2 groups) Low  51 (50.0)  1.3  1.0  (1.8)  0.67  0.3  0.7  0.9 1.3 11.1
High  51 (50.0)  1.2  0.9  (1.8)  0.2  0.7  0.9 1.1 11.4
Division/brigade levelexposure (2 groups) No 17 (16.7) 1.6 1.0 (2.3) 0.96 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 11.1
Low 34 (33.3) 1.1 1.0 (1.6) 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.3 3.9
Moderate 32 (31.4) 1.0 0.9 (1.5) 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.0 4.0
High 19 (18.6) 1.5 1.0 (2.3) 0.2 0.7 0.9 1.2 11.4
Battalion/company level exposure (2 groups)2 Low 47 (62.7) 1.1 1.0 (1.7) 0.93 0.3 0.7 0.9 1.3 4.0
High 28 (37.3) 1.4 1.0 (1.9) 0.3 0.7 0.9 1.2 11.4
Battalion/company level exposure (4 groups)2 No 15 (20.0) 0.8 0.8 (1.6) 0.30 0.3 0.6 0.7 1.1 1.8
Low 32 (42.7) 1.3 1.1 (1.7) 0.4 0.8 1.0 1.4 4.0
Moderate 18 (24.0) 1.1 1.0 (1.6) 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.2 2.7
High 10 (13.3) 1.9 1.0 (2.6) 0.3 0.7 0.9 1.1 11.4
Perceived self-reported exposure (2 groups) Low 56 (54.9) 1.2 0.9 (1.8) 0.61 0.3 0.7 0.9 1.2 11.1
High 46 (45.1) 1.3 1.0 (1.8) 0.2 0.7 0.9 1.2 11.4
Perceived self-reported exposure (4 groups) No 31 (30.4) 1.2 0.9 (1.9) 0.29 0.3 0.6 0.8 1.2 11.1
Low 25 (24.5) 1.2 1.1 (1.6) 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.2 4.0
Moderate 29 (28.4) 1.0 0.9 (1.6) 0.2 0.7 0.9 1.2 2.2
High 17 (16.7) 1.8 1.2 (2.2) 0.6 0.7 1.0 1.1 11.4

TCDD, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin; GM, geometric mean; GSD, geometric standard deviation.


2 n=75.

Table 2.
Correlation of exposure-related factors with serum TCDD levels
Factors n Log10TCDD (pg/g lipid)
Pearson’s correlation coefficient p-value
Division/brigade level exposure1 102 -0.06 0.52
Battalion/company level exposure1 75 0.06 0.61
Age as of June 1, 2001 102 -0.04 0.66
Body mass index (kg/m2) 102 0.03 0.76
Smoking (pack-years) in current smokers 41 0.14 0.38

TCDD, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin; Log10TCDD, log-transformed TCDD.

1 Proximity based Agent Orange exposure as a continuous variable (log-transformed E4 score).

Table 3.
Multiple regression analysis for TCDD levels by characteristics in subjects (n=102)
Characteristics Classification Log10TCDD (pg/g lipid)
Characteristics Classification Log10TCDD (pg/g lipid)
10β p-value R square 10β p-value R square
Age (y) as of June 1, 2001 <54 0.76 0.21 0.1591 Battalion/company level exposure (4 groups)2 No REF
54-56 REF Low 1.58 0.03
≥57 0.94 0.8 Moderate 1.28 0.32
Body mass index (kg/m2) <21 1.04 0.87 High 1.45 0.27
21-24.9 REF Division/brigade level exposure (2 groups) Low REF 0.0733
25-26.9 1.27 0.25 High 1.27 0.27
≥27 1.03 0.90 Division/brigade level exposure (4 groups) No REF 0.0733
Smoking Current 0.97 0.89 Low 1.00 0.99
Never REF Moderate 1.25 0.44
Past 0.82 0.33 High 1.29 0.42
Military unit Combat REF Battalion/company level exposure (2 groups)2 Low REF 0.0813
Support 1.10 0.67 High 0.97 0.88
First year of deployment 1964-1967 0.97 0.92 Battalion/company level exposure (4 groups)2 No REF 0.1593
1968-1969 0.90 0.68 Low 1.58 0.03
1970-1973 REF Moderate 1.28 0.32
Duration of deployment in Vietnam (d) ≤358 REF High 1.45 0.27
359-401 1.17 0.41 Perceived self-reported exposure (2 groups) Low REF 0.0673
>401 1.11 0.59 High 1.12 0.43
Military class Enlisted rank REF Perceived self-reported exposure (4 groups) No REF 0.1293
Noncommis- sioned officer 1.21 0.43 Low 1.36 0.09
Moderate 1.13 0.48
Officer 1.23 0.39 High 1.62 0.02

TCDD, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin; Log10TCDD, log-transformed TCDD; β, regression coefficient; REF, reference group.

1 Multiple regression model with independent variables of age, body mass index, smoking, military unit, first year of deployment, duration of deployment in Vietnam, military class, and battalion/company level exposure (4 groups).

2 n=75.

3 Multiple regression model with independent variables of age, body mass index, smoking, military unit, first year of deployment, duration of deployment in Vietnam, military class, and Agent Orange exposure.

Table 4.
Serum TCDD levels in selected populations
Authors Year of blood sampling Populations Exposure group n Serum TCDD levels (pg/g lipid)
Median Minimum-Maximum Mean SD
This study 2001 Korean Vietnam veterans Total 102 0.9 0-11.4 1.2 1.5
No1 17 0.9 0-11.1 1.6 2.5
Low1 34 1.0 0.4-3.9 1.1 0.6
Moderate1 32 0.8 0.5-4.0 1.0 0.6
High1 19 0.9 0-11.4 1.5 2.4
Kim et al., 2001 [5] 1996 Korean non-Vietnam veterans Non-Vietnam veterans 1 (25)2 0.3
Korean Vietnam veterans Total 12 (720)2 0.72
Group 1 3 (180)2 0.6
Group 2 3 (180)2 0.62
Group 3 3 (180)2 0.78
Group 4 3 (180)2 0.87
CDC, 1988 [3] 1986-1987 US non-Vietnam veteran Control 97 3.8 0-15 4.1 2.3
US Vietnam veterans Total 646 3.8 0-45 4.2 2.6
Low 298 3.9
Medium 157 3.4
High 191 3.8
Wolfe et al., 1990 [8] 1987 US non-Vietnam Air Force veterans All personnel 856 4.2 0-54.8
US Ranch Hand Vietnam veterans Total 888 12.4 0-617.7
Flying officers (pilots) 247 7.3 0-42.6
Flying officers (navigators) 63 9.3 1.1-35.9
Non-flying officers 19 6.6 3.1-24.9
Flying enlisted personnel 152 17.2 0-195.5
Non-flying enlisted personnel 407 23.6 0-617.7
Kang et al., 2006 [22] 1999-2000 US Army Chemical Corps Non-Vietnam non-sprayers 87 0.4-12.5 2.1
Non-Vietnam sprayers 9 0.8-9.6 3.1
Vietnam non-sprayers 413 0.6-27.7 2.7
Vietnam sprayers 357 0.5-85.8 4.3
Needham et al., 1997 [33] 1976 Seveso, Italy, population in 1976 Zone A (highly contaminated) 296 447 1.5-56 000
Zone B (moderately contaminated) 80 94 1-725
Zone R (minimally contaminated) 48 48 1-545
Fingerhut et al., 1991 [6] 1988 US TCDD-contaminated production Exposed workers 253 2-3400 233
Workers Non-exposed controls 79 <20 7

CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; TCDD, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin; SD, standard deviation.

1 Division/brigade level proximity-based exposure, 2 cases below the detection limit assigned to be 0.

2 Pooled sample analysis, 1 (25) means 1 pooled sample constituted of the serum of 25 persons.

Figure & Data



    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Determinants of exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls in the Italian population in the last decades
      Anna Maria Ingelido, Vittorio Abate, Annalisa Abballe, Stefania Paola De Filippis, Elena Dellatte, Silvia De Luca, Fabiola Ferri, Anna Rita Fulgenzi, Nicola Iacovella, Anna Laura Iamiceli, Valentina Marra, Roberto Miniero, Silvia Valentini, Elena De Felip
      Environmental Science and Pollution Research.2023; 30(16): 47012.     CrossRef
    • Serum dioxin concentrations in military workers at three dioxin-contaminated airbases in Vietnam
      Phan Van Manh, Pham The Tai, Nguyen Minh Phuong, Muneko Nishijo, Do Minh Trung, Pham Ngoc Thao, Ho Anh Son, Tran Van Tuan, Nguyen Van Chuyen, Nguyen Van Long, Nguyen Van Khoi, Nguyen Tung Linh, Hoang Van Luong, Do Ba Quyet
      Chemosphere.2021; 266: 129024.     CrossRef
    • Risk for animal and human health related to the presence of dioxins and dioxin‐like PCBs in feed and food
      Helle Katrine Knutsen, Jan Alexander, Lars Barregård, Margherita Bignami, Beat Brüschweiler, Sandra Ceccatelli, Bruce Cottrill, Michael Dinovi, Lutz Edler, Bettina Grasl‐Kraupp, Christer Hogstrand, Carlo Stefano Nebbia, Isabelle P Oswald, Annette Petersen
      EFSA Journal.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Concentrations of polychlorinated dibenzodioxins, polychlorodibenzofurans, and polychlorobiphenyls in women of reproductive age in Italy: A human biomonitoring study
      Anna Maria Ingelido, Vittorio Abate, Annalisa Abballe, Fulvia Lucia Albano, Tatiana Battista, Valter Carraro, Michele Conversano, Rosa Corvetti, Silvia De Luca, Silva Franchini, Anna Rita Fulgenzi, Laura Giambanco, Nicola Iacovella, Anna Laura Iamiceli, A
      International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health.2017; 220(2): 378.     CrossRef
    • High Prevalence of Agent Orange Exposure Among Thyroid Cancer Patients in the National Va Healthcare System
      Karen T. Le, Mark P. Sawicki, Marilene B. Wang, Jerome M. Hershman, Angela M. Leung
      Endocrine Practice.2016; 22(6): 699.     CrossRef
    • Herbicide Exposure, Vietnam Service, and Hypertension Risk in Army Chemical Corps Veterans
      Yasmin S. Cypel, Amii M. Kress, Stephanie M. Eber, Aaron I. Schneiderman, Victoria J. Davey
      Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine.2016; 58(11): 1127.     CrossRef
    • Authors' response to: ME Ginevan et al. Exposure estimates in epidemiological studies of Korean veterans of the Vietnam War
      S.-W. Yi, S.-Y. Ryu
      International Journal of Epidemiology.2015; 44(1): 359.     CrossRef
    • A critical review of the epidemiology of Agent Orange or 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and lymphoid malignancies
      Ellen T. Chang, Paolo Boffetta, Hans-Olov Adami, Jack S. Mandel
      Annals of Epidemiology.2015; 25(4): 275.     CrossRef
    • A critical review of the epidemiology of Agent Orange/TCDD and prostate cancer
      Ellen T. Chang, Paolo Boffetta, Hans-Olov Adami, Philip Cole, Jack S. Mandel
      European Journal of Epidemiology.2014; 29(10): 667.     CrossRef
    • Challenges in investigating the association between Agent Orange and cancer: Site‐specific cancer risk and accuracy of exposure assessment
      Thomas H. Sinks
      Cancer.2014; 120(23): 3595.     CrossRef
    • Agent Orange exposure and cancer incidence in Korean Vietnam veterans: A prospective cohort study
      Sang‐Wook Yi, Heechoul Ohrr
      Cancer.2014; 120(23): 3699.     CrossRef
    • Agent Orange exposure and risk of death in Korean Vietnam veterans: Korean Veterans Health Study
      Sang-Wook Yi, So-Yeon Ryu, Heechoul Ohrr, Jae-Seok Hong
      International Journal of Epidemiology.2014; 43(6): 1825.     CrossRef


    JPMPH : Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health