Figure 1
Calculation of Value Incentive Program's composite quality score.
AMI, acute myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; C-section, Caesarian section.
Figure 2Model of the Value Incentive Program in Korea.
Figure 3Improvement in composite quality scores of acute myocardial infarction care by year.
Figure 4Improvement in composite quality scores of Caesarean section rate by year.
Figure 5Expanded Value Incentive Program model in Korea.
Figure 6Scatter plots of quality and resource use measures of acute myocardial infarction.
Table 1.Payment status of incentives and disincentives
|
1st year (treatment record of second half of 2007)
|
2nd year (treatment record of 2008)
|
3rd year (treatment record of 2009)
|
|
Set the disincentive threshold |
Applied incentives |
Applied incentives and disincentives |
Incentives1
|
|
|
|
No. of institutions |
|
|
|
Total |
|
212
|
262
|
AMI |
- |
15 |
13 |
C-section |
- |
15 |
17 |
Amount of money |
|
|
|
Total |
- |
45 300 |
40 400 |
AMI |
- |
31 000 |
25 000 |
C-section |
- |
14 300 |
15 400 |
Disincentives3
|
- |
- |
None |