Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

JPMPH : Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Prev Med Public Health > Volume 55(6); 2022 > Article
Original Article
Antenatal Care Services and Incidence of Low Birth Weight: A Comparison of Demographic and Health Surveys in 4 ASEAN Countries
Miftahul Arsyi1orcid, Besral Besral1orcid, Milla Herdayati1orcid, Revati Phalkey2,3orcid
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health 2022;55(6):559-567.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.22.316
Published online: November 13, 2022
  • 3,233 Views
  • 158 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref
  • 3 Scopus

1Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia

2Heidelberg Institute for Global Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

3Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

Corresponding author: Besral Besral, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, A Building 2nd Floor, FKM UI, Depok 16424, Indonesia E-mail: besral@ui.ac.id
• Received: July 20, 2022   • Accepted: September 30, 2022

Copyright © 2022 The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • Objectives:
    This study aimed to assess the effect of complete coverage and content of available antenatal care (ANC) on the incidence of low birth weight (LBW) in 4 countries belonging to the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).
  • Methods:
    Measures of complete coverage and content of ANC services included the frequency of ANC visits and the seven service components (blood pressure measurement, iron supplementation, tetanus toxoid immunization, explanations of pregnancy complications, urine sample test, blood sample test, and weight measurement). The complete coverage and content of ANC services were assessed as high if more than 4 ANC visits and all seven components were delivered. Multivariable logistic regression with complex survey designs was conducted using Demographic Health Survey data from the 4 ASEAN countries in question from 2014 to 2017.
  • Results:
    The proportion of LBW infants was higher in the Philippines (13.8%) than in Indonesia (6.7%), Cambodia (6.7%), or Myanmar (7.5%). Poor ANC services were associated with a 1.30 times higher incidence of LBW than a high level of complete coverage and content of ANC services (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11 to 1.52). In addition, the risk of LBW was higher in the Philippines than in other countries (aOR, 2.25; 95% CI, 2.01 to 2.51) after adjusting for mothers’ demographic/socioeconomic factors, health behaviors, and other factors.
  • Conclusions:
    In sum, complete coverage and content of ANC services were significantly associated with the incidence of LBW in Indonesia, Cambodia, and Myanmar. The Philippines did not show statistically significant results for this relationship, but had a higher risk of LBW with poor ANC.
Low birth weight (LBW) is defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a birth weight of less than 2500 g (5.5 pounds) [1]. LBW can occur due to preterm birth or due to restricted intrauterine growth in a full-term infant. Babies with LBW are at risk for neonatal death; those that survive are at higher risk of growth delays, lower intelligence, and experiencing non-communicable diseases like obesity and diabetes as adults [2]. In 2015, 14.6% of the 20.5 million babies born were estimated to have LBW, and of this number around 96.5% were born in developing countries. According to the WHO (2018), 60-80% of neonatal deaths were caused by LBW. More than half of babies with LBW came from the Asian continent, and South Asia was the largest contributor to the global incidence of LBW, followed by Southeast Asia, which accounted for 12.3% of global LBW births. The decline in the incidence of LBW from 2000 to 2015 was slow in Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries, decreasing by only 1.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9 to 1.9). South Asian countries, in contrast, experienced a decrease of 5.9% (95% CI, 3.8 to 8.8) over the same period of time [2-4].
Demographic Health Survey (DHS) data showed the following prevalence rates of LBW in 4 ASEAN countries: Indonesia at 7% (2017), Cambodia at 7.9% (2014), the Philippines at 15% (2017), and Myanmar at 8.1% (2015-2016) [5-8]. Trends in the prevalence of LBW from 2000 to 2015, derived from data from the United Nations Children’s Fund, showed an annual decrease in the incidence of LBW by 0.1% [2]. However, this has not been enough to reduce the impact of the risk of neonatal death in Indonesia, Cambodia, Myanmar, and the Philippines [9]. Reducing the incidence of LBW has long been a global public health priority. Countries committed to a 30% reduction in LBW between 2012 and 2025 at the 65th World Health Assembly in 2012 [3]. High-quality antenatal care (ANC) is key for reducing the incidence of LBW, as the ANC services obtained by the mother during pregnancy and the health of the newborn are correlated [10-12]. These services are related to prevention, early detection, and maintenance of good health during pregnancy. The comprehensive WHO guidelines on ANC involve a “focused ANC” package that includes the frequency and timing of ANC visits, as well as the quality of ANC. In these guidelines, at least 4 ANC visits are recommended, 1 each for the first and second trimesters, and 2 for the third. These visits can include tracing maternal disease history; examinations of blood pressure, anemia, and fetal movement; screening and tests; treatment of syphilis and bacteriuria if indicated; preventive measures such as tetanus toxoid immunization and iron and folic acid supplementation; and overall health education [13,14].
Ineffective ANC can negatively affect birth outcomes, whereas ANC interventions can improve birth outcomes [15]. Nevertheless, the prevalence of LBW varies widely between regions and countries. Ninety-seven percent of LBW occurs in low-income and middle-income countries [3], and LBW is most common among the most susceptible segments of society, such as the poor living in remote areas. In addition, poor people who live in remote areas may have difficulty accessing adequate health services. There is also a possibility that poor females often lack access to quality health services, which, along with poor nutritional quality and health conditions, increases their chances of giving birth to LBW babies.
ANC services are key to maternal health monitoring and the early detection of danger signs. Prioritizing the measurement of body weight and fetal development every month can be an effective strategy for reducing the incidence of LBW [16]. The results of a study on the effects of ANC services on the incidence of LBW, after controlling for the covariate variables (generating adjusted odds ratios [aORs]), showed that mothers who received poor-quality ANC were at a higher risk of giving birth to babies with LBW. da Fonseca et al. [12], in a study conducted in São Paulo, Brazil, reported that the odds of the incidence of LBW in mothers who received poor-quality ANC services were 4.13 times higher than those who received good-quality ANC services (aOR, 4.13; 95% CI, 1.36 to 12.51). Oulay et al. [17] in the Lao PDR and Kananura et al. [18] in Eastern Uganda reported that among pregnant females who had at least 4 ANC visits, those who made their first visit in the second trimester or later were more likely to give birth to LBW babies.
To the best of our knowledge, no research to date has examined the effects of the complete coverage and content of ANC service on the incidence of LBW in ASEAN countries. This study aimed to determine these effects by controlling for maternal variables (mother’s age at pregnancy and parity), maternal health and habits (ANC provider and smoking status), infant factors (sex, birth spacing), household social characteristics (mother’s education level, economic status, area of residence), and socio-familial empowerment (who makes decisions in the family) in 4 ASEAN countries.
Data Source
This cross-sectional study extracted DHS data (from https://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm) for the 4 countries. DHSs have been conducted in over 90 countries worldwide; six ASEAN countries have conducted surveys, but only 4 of these have done so within the last 10 years, namely Indonesia (2017), Cambodia (2014), Myanmar (2015-2016), and the Philippines (2017). These 4 ASEAN countries were selected based on the availability of complete information on the required variables, particularly ANC services and the covariates.
The DHSs were sampled in two stages according to stratified sampling methods and were nationally representative. The stratification strategy divided the population into groups. During the first stage of sampling, primary sampling units were based on census enumeration areas within each stratum, which was selected through the probability proportional to size method. In the second stage, a systematic sample of households was drawn from the list of households. All females of reproductive age (15-49 years) in the selected households were eligible for interviews, which was the focus of the survey. The female’s questionnaire asked for self-reported information on pregnancy history, socioeconomic and demographic characteristics, and involvement in household decision-making [19]. Detailed information on the study design and data collection procedures of 4 ASEAN countries has been published elsewhere [5-8].
This study’s participants were all females aged 15-49 years in Indonesia, Cambodia, Myanmar, and the Philippines who had live births during the last 5 years before the survey was conducted. The inclusion criteria were singleton births and access to information on the birth weight of the baby, either through a written card or mother’s recall. We limited our analysis to singletons because multiple births are closely related to premature births, which are also likely to be LBW. The exclusion criteria were incomplete data on any of the identified research variables. Details about the research sample are presented in Table 1.
Variables and Measurements

Outcome variable

The outcome variable was the incidence of LBW (birth weight less than 2500 g) as defined by the WHO and normal weight (i.e., weight equal to or more than 2500 g), measured via a written card or by mother’s recall.

The explanatory variables

The explanatory variables were as follows: The timing of the first ANC visit was measured according to whether females initiated ANC with a healthcare professional (a doctor, midwife, village midwife [Indonesia], or nurse) or a community volunteer (barangay health worker in the Philippines, village health volunteer in Cambodia, or an auxiliary midwife in Myanmar) whether in the first, second, third trimester, or no ANC visit at all. The timing of the first ANC visit (months) of participants was recoded as first trimester (0-12 weeks), second and third trimesters (>13 weeks), and none (or no ANC visit at all).
The completeness of coverage and content of ANC services was measured by the number of visits (with the ideal being at least 4 antenatal consultations) and receiving 7 aspects of ANC services. The components of ANC service consisted of (1) measurement of blood pressure, (2) iron supplementation, (3) tetanus toxoid immunization, (4) explanations of potential pregnancy complications, (5) a urine sample test, (6) a blood sample test, and (7) measurement of weight. The complete coverage and content of ANC services of participants were recorded as follows: “good (frequency of visits ≥4 times and 7 complete components),” “less (frequency of visits <4 times and 7 complete components),” “less (frequency of visits ≥4 times and 7 components were incomplete),” and “poor (frequency of visits <4 times and 7 components were incomplete).”
The covariates to be controlled included maternal characteristics (mother’s age at pregnancy, parity), maternal health and habits (provider of ANC, smoking status), infant factors (baby’s sex, birth spacing), household social characteristics (mother’s education level, wealth index, area of residence), and socio-familial empowerment (who makes the decisions in the family). Detailed definitions of the covariates can be found in the Supplemental Material 1.
Statistical Analysis
Data analysis was conducted using the complex survey design, which considers weighted, strata, and clusters; this was carried out following the DHS sample design, which uses a 2-stage probability sampling technique. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the effect of complete coverage and content of ANC services on the incidence of LBW. The final model contained all variables that were substantially correlated to the incidence of LBW. The confounding variables were assessed by excluding covariates with a p-value >0.05 and assessing changes in the OR. If the OR changed by over 10%, then the covariate variable was kept in the model [20]. In Myanmar’s DHS (2015-2016 MDHS), there were no weight measurements; instead, its analysis focused on 6 components of ANC services, whereas the data analyzed for Indonesia, the Philippines, and Cambodia contained 7 components.
Ethics Statement
This study was based on a secondary data analysis of DHS. The authors’ permission to use and download the data was given by ICF Internasional. The ethical approval was granted by an ethical committee from the Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia with approval No. Ket- 30/UN2.F10.D11/PPM.00.02/2021.
The incidence of LBW and the characteristics of the respondents varied widely across the 4 ASEAN countries included in the study (Table 2). The proportions in the Philippines, Myanmar, Indonesia, and Cambodia were 13.8%, 7.5%, 6.7%, and 6.7%, respectively. In addition, the risk of LBW was higher in the Philippines than in other countries (aOR, 2.25; 95% CI, 2.01 to 2.51). Table 3 presents an overview of ANC in the 4 countries. The highest rate of good ANC (more than 4 visits and 7 completed components) was in Myanmar at 45.5%, while the highest rate of poor ANC (fewer than 4 visits and 7 completed components) was in Cambodia at 23.3%. There were minimal differences in terms of the rates of 4 or more ANC visits; the highest was 84.7% in Indonesia, while the lowest was 73% in Cambodia and Myanmar. The highest proportion of the 7 completed ANC components was in Myanmar (52.2%), while the lowest was in Indonesia (14.3%). The types of ANC services received also varied across the countries. In Indonesia, the most common type was blood pressure measurement (90.5%), and the least common type was urine sample tests (34.0%). In Cambodia, the most common was iron supplementation (90.4%), while the least common was urine sample tests (45.8%). In Myanmar, the most common type was iron supplementation (91.3%), and the least common type was urine sample tests (68.6%). In the Philippines, the most common type was blood pressure measurement (83.6%), and the least common was type blood sample tests (61.2%).
Lastly, the odds of pregnant female who received poor ANC services (in terms of complete coverage and content) for experiencing LBW was 1.30 times higher than those who received good ANC services (aOR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.52) (Table 4). A first-trimester ANC visit was not significantly associated with the incidence of LBW in any of the 4 countries (Table 5). The results of this analysis also showed that the completeness of coverage and content of ANC services was significantly associated with the incidence of LBW in Indonesia, Cambodia, and Myanmar. Although the results of the Philippines were not statistically significant, the Philippines showed a potential risk of LBW associated with poor complete coverage and content of ANC services, as the odds for the incidence of LBW in mothers with poor complete coverage and content of ANC services was 1.18 times higher than those with good ANC services (aOR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.75).
This study aimed to determine the effects of complete coverage and content of ANC services on the incidence of LBW in 4 ASEAN countries. The results showed that mothers who received poor ANC services were 1.30 times more likely to give birth to LBW babies after controlling for maternal age, the baby’s sex, ANC provider, smoking status, maternal education, parity, wealth index, area of residence, and socio-familial empowerment variables. Indonesia, Cambodia, and Myanmar showed statistically significant LBW risks, of which Myanmar had the highest (aOR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.49 to 4.49). However, it should be noted that Myanmar has a high missing data rate, which may have affected the results of this study. The results of this study align with the research of Servan-Mori et al. [21], which stated that both the timeliness of ANC visits and the quality of basic services are key to reducing the incidence of LBW. Although the results of the Philippines were not statistically significant, it had a risk of LBW associated with poor complete coverage and content of ANC services, as the odds for the incidence of LBW in mothers with poor complete coverage and content of ANC services was 1.18 times higher than those with good ANC services (aOR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.75). These findings are consistent with previous results reported in the literature [11,22,23].
These results also showed that an ANC visit in the first trimester did not affect the incidence of LBW across the 4 countries. However, different results were reported by Bhaskar et al. [24] in Eastern Nepal and Paul et al. [11] in India, who found that mothers who made their first ANC visit in the second or third trimester were at a higher risk of giving birth to babies with LBW than mothers who underwent first ANC visits in the first trimester. We assume that the fixed effect of the composite variable of the complete coverage and content of ANC services in this study substantially influenced the significance of the first ANC visit. Consequently, first-trimester ANC alone is not enough to reduce the incidence of LBW—instead, the quality of ANC, combined with a minimum quantity, is essential. During ANC visits, pregnant female should receive a complete range of services. According to the literature, to reduce LBW incidence, full ANC services are the most effective strategy [11]. The results of this study, however, showed that good complete coverage and content of ANC services infrequently occur, in about 14.7% of female in Indonesia, 28.2% in Cambodia, 44.2% in the Philippines, and 45.5% in Myanmar.
The reason for the incompleteness of the 7 ANC service components was due to the low frequency of laboratory tests (urine and blood) in all 4 countries (ranging from 34.0 to 68.6% for urine sample tests and 44.4 to 70.7% for blood sample tests). Based on a mapping of routine ANC components in Asian countries, Benova et al. [25] found that taking urine and blood samples had the lowest coverage of ANC components and stated this area needed the most improvement. Concentrating exclusively on the number of ANC visits may have reduced coverage effectiveness. Even with a higher overall median number of ANC visits, countries with a larger range of ANC visits (e.g., Egypt, Jordan, and Indonesia) were less likely to reach high coverage levels for all 6 routinely measured components of care, including blood pressure measurements, urine samples, blood samples, tetanus protection, iron supplementation, and the receipt of information on potential complications. According to the WHO, the 2016 ANC guideline emphasizes the quality of care provided during each contact, highlighting the components of high-quality care.
ANC services are key to maternal health monitoring and the early detection of danger signs. Prioritizing the measurement of body weight and fetal development every month can be an effective strategy for reducing the incidence of LBW. Weighing the mother at each visit is intended to detect fetal growth disorders. A weight gain of less than 9 kg throughout the pregnancy, or less than 1 kg per month, indicates a fetal growth disorder [16]. The measurement of blood pressure is intended to determine the potential risk of hypertension, as uncontrolled hypertension during pregnancy can lead to pre-eclampsia, and mothers with both mild and severe pre-eclampsia often give birth to LBW babies. Similarly, iron tablets function as a nutritional supplement for both the mother and the fetus. The WHO recommends providing iron supplements of 20-60 mg and folic acid supplements of 0.4 mg in addition to context-specific interventions for pregnant female who experience anemia [13]. One of the purposes of the urine sample test is to determine the presence of protein in the urine (proteinuria), which is another indicator of pre-eclampsia, and one of the purposes of examining a blood sample is to determine hemoglobin levels, as low hemoglobin levels can indicate anemia [16]. Limited or incomplete monitoring of maternal health and the absence of basic laboratory testing is a concern in all 4 countries included in this study.
The results of this study strengthen those from previous studies that used DHS data in Colombia (2015), in which the risk of LBW after non-standardized ANC services was 1.8 times higher than after standardized ANC services [26]. In another study by Zhou et al. [10] in 42 poor counties in Western China, the results showed that children whose mothers did not receive ANC components, such as measurements of weight and blood pressure and blood and urine tests, had a higher risk of LBW compared to those whose mothers received them.
The findings show that a first-trimester ANC visit alone is not enough to reduce the incidence of LBW. We obtained consistent results across 4 ASEAN countries (Indonesia, Myanmar, Cambodia, and the Philippines), indicating that high-quality ANC services are as important as quantity. Pregnant females are advised to have at least 4 ANC visits that include a complete set of 7 ANC component services. Special efforts need to be focused on pregnant female with low education levels and low economic status. It is recommended that first of all, healthcare workers who provide ANC services should seek to improve the completeness of coverage and content of ANC services to all pregnant female. Secondly, increasing maternal health literacy is very important for the well-being of mothers and babies (for example, emphasizing the importance of full ANC services). Thirdly, urine samples and blood samples are among the components of ANC that require the greatest improvement across 4 ASEAN countries. Fourthly, a focus on quality in addition to the minimum quantity of ANC services is a necessity. Lastly, as evidenced by the results of most of the participants in rural areas having a higher risk of LBW in this study, efforts need to be made to improve the accessibility and cost burdens of ANC.
Strengths and Limitations of This Study
One advantage of this research was its use of survey data with a high national-level sample size, meaning that the results of the analysis can be defined both nationally and with high levels of precision. Measurements of the complete coverage and content of ANC services were based on maternal recall up to 5 years, which may have introduced reporting and recall bias. We have no way of knowing from the DHS data whether the ANC components were completed at the right time, with the correct frequency, or with an appropriate response. A more accurate measure of quality, to which females with complications or infections known to increase the risk of LBW responded appropriately, could perhaps have shown much stronger effects. Secondly, mothers’ recall of LBW may not have been precise. Measurements of the outcome of LBW are subject to misclassification, particularly if relying on maternal recall rather than a health card (which can also be subject to mismeasurement and misreporting). In addition, a significant proportion of the children did not have their birth weight recorded (Table 1). The present results may be impacted by these missing values (selection bias), especially for Myanmar, which had high missing rates (up to 48%). Lastly, the study did not control for additional variables related to the incidence of LBW, such as maternal nutritional status, changes in maternal weight during pregnancy, and occupation; therefore, confounder bias was possible.
Supplemental material is available at https://doi.org/10. 3961/jpmph.22.316.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflicts of interest associated with the material presented in this paper.

FUNDING

This study was funded by Universitas Indonesia.

The authors would like to thank all parties who have contributed to this research, including the Demographic Health Survey as the owner of the data. The publication is sponsored by the Directorate of Research and Community Service Universitas Indonesia.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conceptualization: Arsyi M, Besral B, Herdayati M, Phalkey R. Data curation: Arsyi M. Formal analysis: Arsyi M. Funding acquisition: Besral B. Methodology: Arsyi M, Besral B, Phalkey R. Project administration: Arsyi M, Besral B. Visualization: Arsyi M. Writing – original draft: Arsyi M. Writing – review & editing; Arsyi M, Besral B, Herdayati M, Phalkey R.

jpmph-22-316f1.jpg
Table 1.
Study population of the Demographic and Health Surveys (2014-2017)
Country All female Singleton births Babies who were weighed Complete data
Indonesia 17 848 17 595 16 115 15 155
Cambodia 7165 7031 6299 5691
Myanmar 4815 4726 1986 1875
The Philippines 10 551 10 372 8471 7741
Total 40 379 39 724 32 871 30 462
Table 2.
Incidence of LBW and characteristics of respondents in Indonesia, Cambodia, Myanmar, and the Philippines
Variables Indonesia 2017 (n = 15 155) Cambodia 2014 (n = 5691) Myanmar 2015-2016 (n = 1875) The Philippines 2017 (n = 7741)
LBW
 Yes 1019 (6.7) 383 (6.7) 140 (7.5) 1071 (13.8)
 No 14 136 (93.3) 5308 (93.3) 1735 (92.5) 6670 (86.2)
Baby’s sex
 Female 7356 (48.5) 2787 (49.0) 854 (45.5) 3667 (47.4)
 Male 7799 (51.5) 2904 (51.0) 1021 (54.5) 4074 (52.5)
Mother’s age at pregnancy (y)
 20-35 11 253 (74.3) 4586 (80.6) 1396 (74.5) 5642 (72.9)
 <20 or >35 3902 (25.7) 1105 (19.4) 479 (25.5) 2099 (27.1)
Mother’s education
 Secondary or higher 7525 (49.6) 480 (8.4) 340 (18.1) 5056 (65.3)
 Primary 6604 (43.6) 2278 (40.0) 1015 (54.1) 2006 (25.9)
 None 1026 (6.8) 2933 (51.6) 520 (27.8) 679 (8.8)
Wealth index1
 Richest 3570 (23.5) 1518 (26.6) 458 (24.4) 834 (10.8)
 Richer 3056 (20.2) 1067 (18.8) 480 (25.6) 1163 (15.0)
 Middle 2956 (19.5) 951 (16.7) 345 (18.4) 1492 (19.3)
 Poorer 2853 (18.8) 1033 (18.2) 329 (17.6) 1946 (25.1)
 Poorest 2720 (18.0) 1122 (19.7) 263 (14.0) 2306 (29.8)
Area of residence
 Urban 7820 (51.6) 1662 (29.2) 694 (37.0) 2667 (34.5)
 Rural 7335 (48.4) 4029 (70.8) 1181 (63.0) 5074 (65.5)
Socio-familial empowerment2
 Discussion 7911 (52.2) 2340 (41.1) 729 (38.9) 5789 (74.8)
 No discussion 7244 (47.8) 3351 (58.9) 1146 (61.1) 1952 (25.2)

Values are presented as number (%).

LBW, low birth weight.

1 A composite indicator dividing the households into 5 categories using principal component analysis based on information from housing characteristics and ownership of household durable goods.

2 Female’s power balance within social networks and their freedom of mobility; As well as representing woman’s familial and marital roles, the model also shows the household status in conflict situations and negotiation.

Table 3.
Overview of ANC services in Indonesia, Cambodia, Myanmar and the Philippines
Variables Indonesia 2017 (n = 15 155) Cambodia 2014 (n = 5691) Myanmar 2015-2016 (n = 1875)1 The Philippines 2017 (n = 7741)
Timing of the first ANC visit
First trimester 11 292 (74.5) 4336 (76.2) 856 (45.6) 4603 (59.5)
Second/third trimester 2379 (15.7) 830 (14.6) 873 (46.6) 1923 (24.8)
None 1484 (9.8) 525 (9.2) 146 (7.8) 1215 (15.7)
Completeness of the coverage and content of ANC services
Good (frequency of visits ≥4 times and 7 complete components) 2234 (14.7) 1603 (28.2) 854 (45.5) 3425 (44.2)
Less (frequency of visits <4 times and 7 complete components) 50 (0.3) 212 (3.7) 125 (6.7) 220 (2.8)
Less (frequency of visits ≥4 times and 7 components were incomplete) 10 601 (70.0) 2551 (44.8) 517 (27.6) 2477 (32.0)
Poor (frequency of visits <4 times and 7 components were incomplete) 2270 (15.0) 1325 (23.3) 379 (20.2) 1619 (21.0)
ANC frequency
≥4 visits 12 835 (84.7) 4154 (73.0) 1371 (73.1) 5902 (76.2)
<4 visits 2320 (15.3) 1537 (27.0) 504 (26.9) 1839 (23.8)
Completeness of ANC components
Complete (7 components) 2168 (14.3) 1806 (31.7) 979 (52.2) 2846 (36.8)
Incomplete (<7 components) 12 897 (85.7) 3885 (68.3) 896 (47.8) 4895 (63.2)
Received ANC services
Blood pressure measurement 13 712 (90.5) 4985 (87.6) 1684 (89.8) 6475 (83.6)
Iron supplementation 12 374 (81.6) 5147 (90.4) 1712 (91.3) 6253 (80.8)
Tetanus toxoid immunization 9926 (65.5) 4399 (77.3) 1661 (88.6) 5784 (76.9)
Counseling about pregnancy complications 8718 (57.5) 4361 (76.6) 1456 (77.7) 5764 (74.5)
Urine sample examination 5569 (34.0) 2607 (45.8) 1287 (68.6) 5131 (66.3)
Blood sample examination 6728 (44.4) 3962 (69.6) 1325 (70.7) 4738 (61.2)
Weight measurement 13 604 (89.8) 4979 (87.5) - 5842 (75.5)
Provider of ANC
Health workers 13 186 (87.0) 5149 (90.5) 1676 (89.4) 6406 (82.7)
Non-health workers 485 (3.2) 17 (0.3) 53 (2.8) 120 (1.6)
No visits 1484 (9.8) 525 (9.2) 146 (7.8) 1215 (15.7)

Values are presented as number (%).

ANC, antenatal care.

1 Myanmar was the only country for which data were available on 6 components of the complete coverage and content of ANC services.

Table 4.
Relationships of the timing of the first ANC visit and the complete coverage and content of ANC services with the incidence of LBW (multivariable logistic regression)
Variables Incidence of LBW1 p-value2
Timing of the first ANC visit
First trimester 1.00 (reference)
Second/third trimester 0.98 (0.89, 1.10) 0.781
None 0.84 (0.61, 1.17) 0.302
Completeness of coverage and content of ANC services
Good (frequency of visits ≥4 times and 7 complete components) 1.00 (reference)
Less (frequency of visits <4 times and 7 complete components) 1.28 (0.97, 1.69) 0.079
Less (frequency of visits ≥4 times and 7 components were incomplete) 0.94 (0.85, 1.05) 0.250
Poor (frequency of visits <4 times and 7 components were incomplete) 1.30 (1.11, 1.52) 0.001
ASEAN country
Indonesia 1.00 (reference)
Cambodia 0.88 (0.75, 1.02) 0.086
Myanmar 1.02 (0.83, 1.26) 0.826
The Philippines 2.25 (2.01, 2.51) <0.001

Values are presented as adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval).

ANC, antenatal care; LBW, low birth weight; ASEAN, Association of Southeast Asian Nations.

1 Adjusted odds ratio controlled for maternal age during pregnancy, parity, antenatal care provider, smoking status, baby's sex, birth spacing, mother's education level, wealth index, area of residence, and socio-familial empowerment variables.

2 Analysis with multivariable logistic regression.

Table 5.
Multivariable logistic regression analysis1 of factors affecting the incidence of LBW in 4 ASEAN countries
Variables Indonesia Cambodia Myanmar2 The Philippines
Timing of the first ANC visit
First trimester 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
Second/third trimester 1.01 (0.80, 1.28) 0.97 (0.64, 1.47) 0.98 (0.60, 1.59) 1.03 (0.81, 1.29)
None 0.78 (0.53, 1.15) 0.32 (0.05, 1.89) 1.14 (0.30, 4.33) 1.01 (0.57, 1.81)
Completeness of coverage and content of ANC services
Good (frequency of visits ≥4 times and 7 complete components) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
Less (frequency of visits <4 times and 7 complete components) 1.56 (0.48, 5.09) 1.87 (0.96, 3.65) 0.82 (0.36, 1.87) 1.11 (0.63, 1.96)
Less (frequency of visits ≥4 times and 7 components were incomplete) 0.94 (0.76, 1.18) 0.99 (0.71, 1.38) 1.17 (0.70, 1.96) 1.08 (0.84, 1.39)
Poor (frequency of visits <4 times and 7 components were incomplete) 1.57 (1.08, 2.27)2 1.83 (1.13, 2.99)2 2.59 (1.49, 4.49)2 1.18 (0.80, 1.75)

Values are presented as adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval).

LBW, low birth weight; ASEAN, Association of Southeast Asian Nations; ANC, antenatal care.

1 Adjusted odds ratio controlled for maternal age during pregnancy, parity, antenatal care provider, smoking status, baby's sex, birth spacing, mother's education level, wealth index, area of residence, and socio-familial empowerment variables; Analysis with multivariable logistic regression.

2 Myanmar was the only country for which data were available on 6 components of the complete coverage and content of ANC services.

* p<0.05.

  • 1. World Health Organization. Global nutrition targets 2025: low birth weight policy brief; 2014 [cited 2020 Nov 12]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-NMH-NHD-14.5
  • 2. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Low birthweight; 2019 [cited 2020 Nov 12]. Available from: https://data.unicef.org/topic/nutrition/low-birthweight/
  • 3. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF); World Health Organization (WHO). UNICEF-WHO low birthweight estimates: levels and trends 2000-2015: new global, regional and national estimates of low birthweight. 2019 [cited 2021 Nov 12]. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/reports/UNICEF-WHO-low-birthweight-estimates-2019
  • 4. World Health Organization. Preterm and low birth weight infants. 2018 [cited 2020 Nov 12]. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/maternal-newborn-child-adolescent-health-and-ageing/newborn-health/preterm-and-low-birth-weight
  • 5. National Population and Family Planning Board (BKKBN); Statistics Indonesia (BPS); Ministry of Health (Kemenkes); ICF. In donesia Demographic and Health Survey 2017; 2018 [cited 2020 Nov 12]. Available from: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR342/FR342.pdf
  • 6. National Institute of Statistics; Directorate General for Health; ICF International. Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey 2014; 2015 [cited 2020 Nov 12]. Available from: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/fr312/fr312.pdf
  • 7. Philippine Statistics Authority; ICF. Philippines National Demographic and Health Survey 2017. 2018 [cited 2020 Nov 12]. Available from: https://psa.gov.ph/sites/default/files/PHILIPPINE%20NATIONAL%20DEMOGRAPHIC%20AND%20HEALTH-%20SURVEY%202017_new.pdf
  • 8. Ministry of Health and Sports; ICF. Myanmar Demographic and Health Survey 2015-16; 2017 [cited 2020 Nov 12]. Available from: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR324/FR324.pdf
  • 9. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Maternal and newborn health disparities country profiles; [cited 2022 Nov 14]. Available from: https://data.unicef.org/resources/maternal-newborn-health-disparities-country-profiles/
  • 10. Zhou H, Wang A, Huang X, Guo S, Yang Y, Martin K, et al. Quality antenatal care protects against low birth weight in 42 poor counties of Western China. PLoS One 2019;14(1):e0210393ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 11. Paul P, Zaveri A, Chouhan P. Assessing the impact of antenatal care utilization on low birthweight in India: analysis of the 2015-2016 National Family Health Survey. Child Youth Serv Rev 2019;106: 104459Article
  • 12. da Fonseca CR, Strufaldi MW, de Carvalho LR, Puccini RF. Adequacy of antenatal care and its relationship with low birth weight in Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil: a case-control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014;14: 255ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 13. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. 2016 [cited 2020 Nov 12]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549912
  • 14. Lincetto O, Mothebesoane-Anoh S, Gomez P, Munjanja S. Antenatal care. In: Lawn J, Kerber K, editors. Opportunities for Africa’s newborns: practical data, policy and programmatic support for newborn care in Africa. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. p. 51-62
  • 15. Bountogo M, Sié A, Zakané A, Compaoré G, Ouédraogo T, Lebas E, et al. Antenatal care attendance and risk of low birthweight in Burkina Faso: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021;21(1):825ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 16. Indonesian Ministry of Health. Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Health Minister Number 97 in 2014. 2015 [cited 2020 Nov 12]. Available from: https://sikompak.bappenas.go.id/pembelajaran/view/52/id/other_doc/Permenkes%20No%2097%20tahun%202014%20tentang%20P4K/download.pdf (Indonesian)
  • 17. Oulay L, Laohasiriwong W, Phajan T, Assana S, Suwannaphant K. Effect of antenatal care on low birth weight prevention in Lao PDR: a case control study [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2018;7: 1138
  • 18. Kananura RM, Wamala R, Ekirapa-Kiracho E, Tetui M, Kiwanuka SN, Waiswa P, et al. A structural equation analysis on the relationship between maternal health services utilization and newborn health outcomes: a cross-sectional study in Eastern Uganda. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017;17(1):98ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 19. United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Guide to DHS statistics. 2018 [cited 2020 Nov 12]. Available from: https://dhsprogram.com/publications/publication-dhsg1-dhs-questionnaires-and-manuals.cfm
  • 20. Hastono SP. Health data analysis. Depok: Rajawali Pers. 2016 (Indonesian)
  • 21. Servan-Mori E, Sosa-Rubí SG, Najera-Leon E, Darney BG. Timeliness, frequency and content of antenatal care: which is most important to reducing indigenous disparities in birth weight in Mexico? Health Policy Plan 2016;31(4):444-453ArticlePubMed
  • 22. Tafere TE, Afework MF, Yalew AW. Providers adherence to essential contents of antenatal care services increases birth weight in Bahir Dar City Administration, north West Ethiopia: a prospective follow up study. Reprod Health 2018;15(1):163ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 23. Assefa N, Berhane Y, Worku A. Wealth status, mid upper arm circumference (MUAC) and antenatal care (ANC) are determinants for low birth weight in Kersa, Ethiopia. PLoS One 2012;7(6):e39957ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 24. Bhaskar RK, Deo KK, Neupane U, Chaudhary Bhaskar S, Yadav BK, Pokharel HP, et al. A case control study on risk factors associated with low birth weight babies in eastern Nepal. Int J Pediatr 2015;2015: 807373ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 25. Benova L, Tunçalp Ö, Moran AC, Campbell OM. Not just a number: examining coverage and content of antenatal care in low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Glob Health 2018;3(2):e000779ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 26. Khanal V, Zhao Y, Sauer K. Role of antenatal care and iron supplementation during pregnancy in preventing low birth weight in Nepal: comparison of national surveys 2006 and 2011. Arch Public Health 2014;72(1):4ArticlePubMedPMCPDF

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Synergistic associations of antenatal care visits and iron-folic acid supplementation with low birth weight: a pooled analysis of national surveys from six south Asian countries
      Vishnu Khanal, Sangita Bista, Shiva Raj Mishra
      BMC Public Health.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Effect of the enhancing nutrition and antenatal infection treatment (ENAT) intervention on birth weight in Ethiopia: a cluster randomized controlled trial
      Y Mekonnen, E Wolde, A Bekele, Z Mehari, S Abebe, T Hagos, Y Tadesse, T Taye, G Asire, T Nigatu, S Kumar, S Girma, M Salasibew
      BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Compliance with the World Health Organization’s 2016 prenatal care contact recommendation reduces the incidence rate of adverse birth outcomes among pregnant women in northern Ghana
      Leticia Achangebe Akum, Eunice Amina Offei, Mary Rachael Kpordoxah, Daudi Yeboah, Abdul-Nasir Issah, Michael Boah, Sanjoy Kumer Dey
      PLOS ONE.2023; 18(6): e0285621.     CrossRef

    Figure

    JPMPH : Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health